Bit parity code for odd number of bits
Solution 1
I would use actual counting rather than bit-level hacks that exploit the representation of the numbers, that would both feel safer and be more clean and easy to understand. Probably slower, of course, but that's a quite nice trade-off especially when one doesn't know anything about the performance expectations.
Do to this, just write code to count the number of 1 bits, the most straight-forward solution generally boils down to a loop.
UPDATE: Given the (weird and annoying) limitations, my response would probably be to unwind the loop given in the "naive" solution on the bithacks page. That wouldn't be pretty, but then I could go do something useful. :)
Solution 2
Your parity function doesn't actually work as far as I can tell - it seems to get the answer right about half of the time, which is about as good as returning a random result (or even just returning 0 or 1 all the time).
There are several bit level hacks which do actually work at: http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#ParityNaive - you probably want to look at the last one of these: http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#ParityParallel
Solution 3
Bit parity may be done like this:
#include <stdio.h>
int parity(unsigned int x) {
int parity=0;
while (x > 0) {
parity = (parity + (x & 1)) % 2;
x >>= 1;
}
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
printf("%d\t%s\n", i, parity(i)?"odd":"even");
}
}
Comments
-
tippenein almost 2 years
I am trying to find the parity of a bitstring so that it returns 1 if x has an odd # of 0's.
I can only use basic bitwise operations and what I have so far passes most of the tests, but I'm wondering 2 things:Why does x ^ (x + ~1) work? I stumbled upon this, but it seems to give you 1 if there are an odd number of bits and something else if even. Like 7^6 = 1 because 7 = 0b0111
Is this the right direction of problem solving for this? I'm assuming my problem is stemming from the first operation, specifically (x + ~1) because it would overflow certain 2's complement numbers. Thanks
Code:
int bitParity(int x) { int first = x ^ (x + ~1); int second = first ^ 1; // if first XOR gave 1 you'll return 0 here int result = !!second; return result; }
-
tippenein over 12 yearsI certainly would use a loop to easily count each bit or even just XOR all the bits together, but for this assignment, I'm not allowed to use control structures. Just | ^ & >> << ~ + ! So, your response was my immediate reaction to this, but no dice.
-
tippenein over 12 yearsI realize my full code doesn't work, but the x ^ (x-1) seemed to give answers that made sense for the values I tried. If you're correct, then I should just dump that and start over.
-
Paul R over 12 yearsJust try the input values 0, 1, 2 and 3 and you will see that it is not going to work.
-
tippenein over 12 yearsI've taken a previously written code for bit counting and just AND'd the result with 0x1 to see if there are an odd number of bits or not. However, I did the bitCount(int x) algorithm via brute force; checked each bit with !!(x & (1<<bit#)) This isn't good enough for me at the moment, but the bit parity problem has been solved by this for now.