MySQL query / clause execution order

30,007

Solution 1

The actual execution of MySQL statements is a bit tricky. However, the standard does specify the order of interpretation of elements in the query. This is basically in the order that you specify, although I think HAVING and GROUP BY could come after SELECT:

  • FROM clause
  • WHERE clause
  • SELECT clause
  • GROUP BY clause
  • HAVING clause
  • ORDER BY clause

This is important for understanding how queries are parsed. You cannot use a column alias defined in a SELECT in the WHERE clause, for instance, because the WHERE is parsed before the SELECT. On the other hand, such an alias can be in the ORDER BY clause.

As for actual execution, that is really left up to the optimizer. For instance:

. . .
GROUP BY a, b, c
ORDER BY NULL

and

. . .
GROUP BY a, b, c
ORDER BY a, b, c

both have the effect of the ORDER BY not being executed at all -- and so not executed after the GROUP BY (in the first case, the effect is to remove sorting from the GROUP BY and in the second the effect is to do nothing more than the GROUP BY already does).

Solution 2

This is how you can get the rough idea about how mysql executes the select query

DROP TABLE if exists new_table;

CREATE TABLE `new_table` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`testdecimal` decimal(6,2) DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`));

INSERT INTO `new_table` (`testdecimal`) VALUES ('1234.45');
INSERT INTO `new_table` (`testdecimal`) VALUES ('1234.45');

set @mysqlorder := '';

select @mysqlorder := CONCAT(@mysqlorder," SELECT ") from new_table,(select @mysqlorder := CONCAT(@mysqlorder," FROM ")) tt
JOIN (select @mysqlorder := CONCAT(@mysqlorder," JOIN1 ")) t on ((select @mysqlorder := CONCAT(@mysqlorder," ON1 ")) or rand() < 1)
JOIN (select @mysqlorder := CONCAT(@mysqlorder," JOIN2 ")) t2 on ((select @mysqlorder := CONCAT(@mysqlorder," ON2 ")) or rand() < 1)
where ((select @mysqlorder := CONCAT(@mysqlorder," WHERE ")) or IF(new_table.testdecimal = 1234.45,true,false))
group by (select @mysqlorder := CONCAT(@mysqlorder," GROUPBY ")),id
having (select @mysqlorder := CONCAT(@mysqlorder," HAVING "))
order by (select @mysqlorder := CONCAT(@mysqlorder," ORDERBY "));

select @mysqlorder;

And here is the output from above mysql query, hope you can figure out the mysql execution of a SELECT query :-

FROM JOIN1 JOIN2 WHERE ON2 ON1 ORDERBY GROUPBY SELECT WHERE ON2 ON1 ORDERBY GROUPBY SELECT HAVING HAVING

Share:
30,007
ericsicons
Author by

ericsicons

Updated on July 25, 2022

Comments

  • ericsicons
    ericsicons over 1 year

    What is the predefined order in which the clauses are executed in MySQL? Is some of it decided at run time, and is this order correct?

    • FROM clause
    • WHERE clause
    • GROUP BY clause
    • HAVING clause
    • SELECT clause
    • ORDER BY clause
  • ericsicons
    ericsicons almost 10 years
    alias can be used in GROUP BY so I guess it is parsed after select. (SELECT name as n, count(name) FROM test group by n) works
  • Gordon Linoff
    Gordon Linoff almost 10 years
    @ericsicons . . . Thank you. I missed that.
  • Shafizadeh
    Shafizadeh about 8 years
    Are you sure FROM is first one? I think WHERE is the first, Consider this: SELECT * FROM table WHERE false. I think it will be faster if WHERE clause be executed sooner than FROM.
  • Gordon Linoff
    Gordon Linoff about 8 years
    @Shafizadeh . . . The interpretation of the query starts with the FROM clause. The execution path is determined by the optimizer.
  • Matthew Read
    Matthew Read about 7 years
    Why do you "think" that? What's your source?
  • pekechis
    pekechis about 7 years
    This is no the order of execution. This is the writing order...nothing to do with the execution order.
  • ReinstateMonica3167040
    ReinstateMonica3167040 over 6 years
    I think SELECT should be 5th
  • Sayakiss
    Sayakiss over 4 years
    Could you please give the exact page of standard states the interpretation order? I downloaded a draft of SQL:2003, but found nothing about that order
  • flow2k
    flow2k almost 4 years
    @GordonLinoff You say "the standard does specify..." Would you please provide a reference to this?
  • Gordon Linoff
    Gordon Linoff almost 4 years
    @flow2k . . . This question is about MySQL. There is actually no reason to go to the standard, because MySQL is quite explicit about the ordering: dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/select.html.