Why do I have to specify the -i switch with a backup extension when using ActivePerl?

13,304

This is a Windows/MS-DOS limitation. According to perldiag:

You're on a system such as MS-DOS that gets confused if you try reading from a deleted (but still opened) file. You have to say -i.bak, or some such.

Perl's -i implementation causes it to delete file1.txt while keeping an open handle to it, then re-create the file with the same name. This allows you to 'read' file1.txt even though it has been deleted and is being re-created. Unfortunately, Windows/MS-DOS does not allow you to delete a file that has an open handle attached to it, so this mechanism does not work.

Your best shot is to use -i.bak and then delete the backup file. This at least gives you some protection - for example, you could opt not to delete the backup if perl exits with a non-zero exit code. Something like:

perl -i.bak -ape "splice...." file1.txt && del file1.bak
Share:
13,304

Related videos on Youtube

Zaid
Author by

Zaid

profile for Zaid on Stack Exchange, a network of free, community-driven Q&A sites http://stackexchange.com/users/flair/45444.png I wear many hats at work: Mechanical Engineer Developer Tester Team Leader Algorithms Analytics Optimization Data Visualization And many hats in life: Dad DIY Mechanic Handyman

Updated on November 12, 2020

Comments

  • Zaid
    Zaid over 3 years

    I cannot get in-place editing Perl one-liners running under ActivePerl to work unless I specify them with a backup extension:

    C:\> perl -i -ape "splice (@F, 2, 0, q(inserted text)); $_ = qq(@F\n);" file1.txt
    Can't do inplace edit without backup.
    

    The same command with -i.bak or -i.orig works a treat but creates an unwanted backup file in the process.

    Is there a way around this?

  • Zaid
    Zaid about 14 years
    So it is a Windows limitation. I was hoping that I wouldn't have to unlink the backup with a separate command... looks like I'll have to. Thanks for the help.
  • Mike
    Mike about 10 years
    Not entirely related, but in-place editing on sed in windows seems to work for me. I can see that your example wouldn't work in sed, but it might be helpful to know.
  • zb226
    zb226 over 7 years
    @Mike: On my end, sed in-place editing leaves temporary files like e.g. sedGihEwg in the file system - yours doesn't? Which version have you got? I'm using GNU sed version 4.2.1.
  • antred
    antred about 6 years
    @Zaid IMO it's a poo Perl implementation rather than a Windows limitation. If you port a program to another OS, your port has to account for the quirks of that OS, and Perl doesn't seem to bother in this case.
  • antred
    antred about 6 years
    And by poo I mean poor. Sorry.