A good random number generator for C
Solution 1
This seems like a good use-case for the Mersenne Twister
- It's faster than most standard implementations of rand()
- It has a very long (2^19937 − 1) period
- It has a pretty high quality - it passes most standardized randomness tests
- It's public domain
Solution 2
If you are looking for a very fast, decent quality algorithm, you should think about xorshift128+
or xorshift1024*
. They are almost as fast as LCGs (according to my comparison they are only 30% slower than simply inline LCG), having much better quality than LCG the same time.
You can find their code and comparison here: http://xorshift.di.unimi.it/
Void Star
Hi, my name is Kyle. I have been interested in science, math, and engineering for (quite literally) as long as I can remember. I am an avid programmer and electronics hobbyist. I attended the University of Washington as an undergraduate in the Electrical Engineering department and now work for Keysight Technologies as a research and development software engineer.
Updated on June 16, 2022Comments
-
Void Star almost 2 years
I need a good random number generator for a program I'm writing in C. It's a fractal flame generator, if you're interested. My images were coming out very grainy, even though I had success with the same algorithm in the past. The difference, I finally realized, was the random number generator I was using. Incredibly, it makes an ENORMOUS difference. I'm hoping that an even better random number generator might yield better results. The answer could come in the form of a code sample or a link to a pre-existing random number library. The most important requirements:
- it should produce relatively high quality streams of random numbers
- its period must be over ten billion
- it should be fast enough and offer a good performance trade-off.
-
UmNyobe about 11 yearsno, he is giving a candidate. +1 btw, never heard of Mersenne before
-
Void Star about 11 yearsWow, this looks like a REALLY good random number generator. Thanks so much Philipp, I would never have found this on my own.
-
Steve Jessop about 11 yearsI'm surprised that MT is faster than most implementations of
rand()
. Isn'trand()
commonly an LCG, hence very fast but poor quality? -
zeboidlund over 10 yearsConsidering the fact that this actually turned my non-working
rand()
-based algorithm into something I could actually work with, +1! -
Void Star over 7 yearsunderappreciated answer here - I've used these in a couple projects so far and they work great, with such a simple implementation!