Android Room database transactions
Solution 1
As pointed out on documentation for Transaction, you can do following:
@Dao
public abstract class ProductDao {
@Insert
public abstract void insert(Product product);
@Delete
public abstract void delete(Product product);
@Transaction
public void insertAndDeleteInTransaction(Product newProduct, Product oldProduct) {
// Anything inside this method runs in a single transaction.
insert(newProduct);
delete(oldProduct);
}
}
Solution 2
As @CommonsWare pointed out, @Query are asynchronous , while @Insert , @Delete , @Update are synchronous.
If you want to execute multiple queries in single transaction , Room also provides a method for that as mentioned below.
roomDB.runInTransaction(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
removeRows(ids);
insertRows(ids);
}
});
I hope this will solve your problem.
Solution 3
For Room transactions in Kotlin you can use:
- Interface with implemented method, like:
@Dao
interface Dao {
@Insert
fun insert(item: Item)
@Delete
fun delete(item: Item)
@Transaction
fun replace(oldItem: Item, newItem: Item){
delete(oldItem)
insert(newItem)
}
}
- Or use open function, like:
@Dao
abstract class Dao {
@Insert
abstract fun insert(item: Item)
@Delete
abstract fun delete(item: Item)
@Transaction
open fun replace(oldItem: Item, newItem: Item){
delete(oldItem)
insert(newItem)
}
}
You'll get error: Method annotated with @Transaction must not be private, final, or abstract.
without open modifier.
Solution 4
I believe when we are using DAO interfaces, still we can perform transaction using default interface methods. We need to add the annotation @JvmDefault and @Transaction and we can perform any operation inside that, which belong to single transaction.
@Dao
interface TestDao {
@Insert
fun insert(dataObj: DataType)
@Update
fun update(dataObj: DataType): Completable
@Delete
fun delete(dataObj: DataType): Completable
@Query("DELETE FROM $TABLE_NAME")
fun deleteAllData()
@Query("SELECT * FROM $TABLE_NAME ORDER BY id DESC")
fun getAllData(): Single<List<DataType>>
@JvmDefault
@Transaction
fun singleTransaction(dataList: List<DataType>) {
deleteAllData()
dataList.forEach {
insert(it)
}
}
}
Rajath
Updated on July 31, 2020Comments
-
Rajath almost 4 years
With the new Room Database in Android, I have a requirement where there are two sequential operations that needs to be made:
removeRows(ids); insertRows(ids);
If I run this, I see (on examining the db) that there are some rows missing - I assume they are being deleted after inserting. viz. the first operation is running in parallel to the second.
If I use a transaction block, such as this, then it's all fine - the first operation seems to complete before doing the second:
roomDb.beginTransaction(); removeRows(ids); roomDb.endTransaction(); insertRows(ids);
It's also fine if I give a sleep in-between instead:
removeRows(ids); Thread.sleep(500); insertRows(ids);
There doesn't seem to be much documentation for Room, and was wondering if I should use the transaction block like the above when I have sequential operations to be done, or is there any better way of doing it.
EDIT: After @CommonsWare pointed out,
@Query
are asynchronous, while@Insert
and@Delete
are synchronous. In view of this, how would I get a query which deletes rows to be async:@Query("DELETE from table WHERE id IN(:ids)") int removeRows(List<Long> ids);
According to the build output I get
Deletion methods must either return void or return int (the number of deleted rows)
, if I try to wrap the return type in aFlowable
. -
johnny_crq over 6 yearswhat if i am using interfaces?
-
guness over 6 years@johnny_crq I was using interfaces and it was not hard to switch to abstract classes. alternatively you might try this ugly trick on interface
@Transaction @Query("DELETE FROM products; INSERT INTO products VALUES(x,y,z)")
over a method. -
IgorGanapolsky about 6 yearsHow would you test this in Espresso, if you are calling
@Query
right after Insert? -
Amit Vikram Singh almost 6 yearsPCMIIW: Query are not always asynchronous. Query is asynchronous only when you are returning an observable e.g. Flowable or LiveData. Since in the question Query is used for removing element, return value is int and hence it will run synchronously.
-
FirstOne almost 6 yearsFor anyone wondering: runInTransaction: "[...]The transaction will be marked as successful unless an exception is thrown in the Runnable."
-
avalancha over 5 years@guness why would that trick be ugly? That is plain SQL syntax, I think it's readable and maintainable, absolutely fine.
-
Cililing over 4 yearsThose are two independent transactions.
-
Abdeldjalil Elaaeieida over 4 yearsinterface method with body!!
-
LukaszTaraszka over 4 yearsWhat about the situation when there is a relation between two objects and second object is in other DAO?
-
guness over 4 years@LukaszTaraszka I think for this situation, there is a method on db itself. it should be like
db.startTransaction(); aDao.do(); bDao.do(); db.endTransaction()
or some kotlin style blocks. but you have to do it outside of a dao. but you have to be careful about async queries. -
Karthik over 3 yearsinsert update and delete annotations already run inside a transaction, wrapping these in another transaction doesn't add any value to it.
-
guness over 3 yearsbut they are in different transactions, wrapping them makes them run in single transaction no?
-
André Luiz Reis over 3 yearsIt gives me an error when I add @JvmDefault as you did in your example.
-
AK Ali over 3 yearsCan you please elaborate what error you are getting?