Angular form updateValueAndValidity of all children controls

36,309

Solution 1

I had the same situation for me to update FormGroup | FormArray at nested level controls.

check this out(worked for me):

/**
 * Re-calculates the value and validation status of the entire controls tree.
 */
function updateTreeValidity(group: FormGroup | FormArray): void {
  Object.keys(group.controls).forEach((key: string) => {
    const abstractControl = group.controls[key];

    if (abstractControl instanceof FormGroup || abstractControl instanceof FormArray) {
      updateTreeValidity(abstractControl);
    } else {
      abstractControl.updateValueAndValidity();
    }
  });
}

Solution 2

It is not possible at the moment to update the descendants of an AbstractControl (FormGroup, ...) with the AbstractControl itself. Maybe in a future release it will be possible.

https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/6170

https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/22166

update: a pull request is already open https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/19829

Solution 3

I solved my issue, which was similar to yours, by recursing the controls and manually triggering the update. Probably this is not an optimal solution:

private triggerValidation(control: AbstractControl) {
    if (control instanceof FormGroup) {
        const group = (control as FormGroup);

        for (const field in group.controls) {
            const c = group.controls[field];

            this.triggerValidation(c);
        }
    }
    else if (control instanceof FormArray) {
        const group = (control as FormArray);

        for (const field in group.controls) {
            const c = group.controls[field];

            this.triggerValidation(c);
        }
    }

    control.updateValueAndValidity({ onlySelf: false });
}

Solution 4

validateFormFields(fields) {
    try {
      Object.entries(fields.controls).forEach((control: any) => {
        if (typeof control[0] == 'Array' 
        ) {
          this.validateFormFields(control[1]);
        } else {
          if (control[1].controls) {
            Object.entries(control[1].controls).forEach((c: any) => {
              c[1].touched = true;
            });
          } else {
            control[1].touched = true;
          }

        }
      });
    } catch (e) {
      console.log(e);
    }
  }

Solution 5

I ran into the same problem, one of the issues was that listening to the valueChanges observable and triggering updateValueAndValidity to run my validators caused an endless loop, so to resolve (and somewhat hacky ?) I created the component variable validityCycleFired and initialized as false, that I toggle and it prevents a runaway loop:

const fireValidityCheck = () => {
     if (this.validityCycleFired) return;
     this.validityCycleFired = true;
     this.passwordForm.get('old_password').updateValueAndValidity();
     this.passwordForm.get('new_password').updateValueAndValidity();
     this.passwordForm.get('confirm_new_password').updateValueAndValidity();
     setTimeout(() => this.validityCycleFired = false, 15);
     return;
};
this.passwordForm.valueChanges.subscribe(fireValidityCheck);
Share:
36,309
Francesco Borzi
Author by

Francesco Borzi

https://github.com/FrancescoBorzi

Updated on July 09, 2022

Comments

  • Francesco Borzi
    Francesco Borzi almost 2 years

    In my Angular 4 app, I have a form with several controls.

    At some points I need to force the update of their validity, so I'm doing:

    this.form.get('control1').updateValueAndValidity();
    this.form.get('control2').updateValueAndValidity();
    this.form.get('control3').updateValueAndValidity();
    // and so on....
    

    and then:

    this.form.updateValueAndValidity();
    

    this works fine.

    However I was wondering if there is a better way to accomplish the same thing, by just calling one method on the parent form.

    According to its documentation, the updateValueAndValidity() method:

    By default, it will also update the value and validity of its ancestors.

    but in my case I need to update the value and validity of its descendants. So I can get rid of many lines of code.

  • Emmanuel
    Emmanuel over 4 years
    Marking the control as touched is what was missing in other answers!