Angular.js and HTML5 date input value -- how to get Firefox to show a readable date value in a date input?
Solution 1
The problem is that value
is ignored when ng-model
is present.
Firefox, which doesn't currently support type="date"
, will convert all the values to string. Since you (rightly) want date
to be a real Date
object and not a string, I think the best choice is to create another variable, for instance dateString
, and then link the two variables:
<input type="date" ng-model="dateString" />
function MainCtrl($scope, dateFilter) {
$scope.date = new Date();
$scope.$watch('date', function (date)
{
$scope.dateString = dateFilter(date, 'yyyy-MM-dd');
});
$scope.$watch('dateString', function (dateString)
{
$scope.date = new Date(dateString);
});
}
The actual structure is for demonstration purposes only. You'd be better off creating your own directive, especially in order to:
- allow formats other than
yyyy-MM-dd
, - be able to use
NgModelController#$formatters
andNgModelController#$parsers
rather than the artificaldateString
variable (see the documentation on this subject).
Please notice that I've used yyyy-MM-dd
, because it's a format directly supported by the JavaScript Date
object. In case you want to use another one, you must make the conversion yourself.
EDIT
Here is a way to make a clean directive:
myModule.directive(
'dateInput',
function(dateFilter) {
return {
require: 'ngModel',
template: '<input type="date"></input>',
replace: true,
link: function(scope, elm, attrs, ngModelCtrl) {
ngModelCtrl.$formatters.unshift(function (modelValue) {
return dateFilter(modelValue, 'yyyy-MM-dd');
});
ngModelCtrl.$parsers.unshift(function(viewValue) {
return new Date(viewValue);
});
},
};
});
That's a basic directive, there's still a lot of room for improvement, for example:
- allow the use of a custom format instead of
yyyy-MM-dd
, - check that the date typed by the user is correct.
Solution 2
Why the value had to be given in yyyy-MM-dd?
According to the input type = date spec of HTML 5, the value has to be in the format yyyy-MM-dd
since it takes the format of a valid full-date
which is specified in RFC3339 as
full-date = date-fullyear "-" date-month "-" date-mday
There is nothing to do with Angularjs since the directive input doesn't support date
type.
How do I get Firefox to accept my formatted value in the date input?
FF doesn't support date
type of input for at least up to the version 24.0. You can get this info from here. So for right now, if you use input with type being date
in FF, the text box takes whatever value you pass in.
My suggestion is you can use Angular-ui's Timepicker and don't use the HTML5 support for the date input.
Solution 3
You can use this, it works fine:
<input type="date" class="form1"
value="{{date | date:MM/dd/yyyy}}"
ng-model="date"
name="id"
validatedateformat
data-date-format="mm/dd/yyyy"
maxlength="10"
id="id"
calendar
maxdate="todays"
ng-click="openCalendar('id')">
<span class="input-group-addon">
<span class="glyphicon glyphicon-calendar" ng-click="openCalendar('id')"></span>
</span>
</input>
Solution 4
In my case, I have solved this way:
$scope.MyObject = // get from database or other sources;
$scope.MyObject.Date = new Date($scope.MyObject.Date);
and input type date is ok
Elise
Updated on February 14, 2020Comments
-
Elise about 4 years
I have an HTML5 date input and I would like its value to be set to the value of the date property in my model by default. I'm not too fussy about formatting since Chrome seems to decide that for me anyway based on my locale, but ideally the format would be consistently
dd/MM/yyyy
.This is how I set up my input:
<input type="date" ng-model="date" value="{{ date | date: 'yyyy-MM-dd' }}" />
This works fine on Chrome, and I see the following by default:
(I still don't quite understand why the value had to be given in
yyyy-MM-dd
, if Chrome still formats it based on my locale, but that's a different question.)My issue is with Firefox not showing the date's value in the way I've specified. I think this has to do with binding the input to the
date
model, because I can specify pretty much any string in thevalue
attribute, and I will still see the long date string in the input by default:If I remove
ng-model="date"
from the input tag, Firefox nicely displays any value I give it. I didn't think the model that an input was bound to actually had any effect on its default value?I understand the date input isn't supported universally, but seeing as it's supposed to fall back on a simple text input, I don't see why its value won't simply be
2013-08-05
, as specified by angular's date filter.So, how do I get Firefox to accept my formatted value in the date input?
NOTE After the edits have been done by the user, I will of course perform validation and convert each date input value into a proper
Date
object. Not sure if this is relevant to the question, but putting it out there just in case, because the input formats would obviously need to be consistent for the date conversion to work the same in all browsers. Problematic, of course, with Chrome deciding the input format for me... -
Elise over 10 yearsThanks, I'm beginning to think myself that some intermediate string variable needs to replace the model bound to my date input. You say I should create directives for this to isolate the string variable -- do I understand it would be something along the lines of updating my actual
date
model when the input's value changes, and not binding the input to a model at all? -
Elise over 10 yearsCool, I was just about to start using this as a rough guide, looks like the technique is more or less the same!
-
Elise over 10 yearsI'll definitely consider Angular's timepicker if I can't crack through it on my own, although I'm wondering about the support for custom styling...
-
Pavel Nikolov over 10 yearsYou don't need
template
andreplace
if you already use a text input. For example I am using an angular-ui-datetimepicker which is a directive applied to a text input. I used the same code and it works. -
imdadhusen almost 10 yearsGreat answer. Thanks you very much for sharing with us. my vote +
-
vp_arth over 9 yearsisn't this
link the two variables
way to getinf digest
exception? -
Blackhole over 9 years@vp_arth No, because
dateFilter(new Date(dateString), 'yyyy-MM-dd') === dateString
andnew Date(dateFilter(date, 'yyyy-MM-dd')) === date
after a few iterations. There are never more than two digest cycles. -
vp_arth over 9 years
new Date(...)
can't to be equal to date, because it's a new object. I check now:new Date(2014, 11, 30) === new Date(2014, 11, 30)
is false. But yes, it's stopped, when strings equal... -
vp_arth over 9 yearsanyway, I think something like
$scope.date.setTime((new Date(datestr)).getTime());
will be much better, because we don't replaceDate
object, just modify it. -
Blackhole over 9 years@vp_arth This answer need to be rewritten anyway, in particular to make the edit less apparent. I'll take your comments into account for that, thank you very much.
-
karaxuna about 9 yearsNice directive approach, but I think it would be better directive to be attribute type directive, not element type.
-
patroqueeet almost 8 yearswhat is openCalendar based upon?
-
Harvey Mushman about 7 yearsDoes having a closing tab for </input> violate w3c void element specification? ...perhaps more importantly does this have any negative browser effects or parser issues.