Are there any disadvantages to using a 4096-bit encrypted SSL certificate?

Question

I was recently requesting a SSL cert via GoDaddy and noticed this message:

In the past I have always generated 2048-bit CSR requests, but this time it got me thinking that perhaps I should "step it up," and it seems like the next step would be a 4096-bit version.

There isn't much info available on 4096-bit SSL certs - but apparently many people have been using 1024-bit certificates until they absolutely had to upgrade and now some browsers won't support the 1024-bit certificates anymore.

How is browser support for 4096-bit certificates? If GoDaddy requires "at least" a 2048-bit certificate, is that enough, or should I try and do something more? If so, what are the advantages and disadvantages?

PS: the two links in GoDaddy's message are CSR Help and Learn more, neither of which I found very helpful.

Solution 1

If you are going to use Amazon CloudFront, they only supports up to 2048 bit keys as of today.

References:

• Having trouble associated SSL cert with Amazon Cloudfront
• SSL certs with keys larger than 2048 bits?

Solution 2

If you have a 4096 bit SSL certificate, in order to support some clients (especially Java-based clients and some older clients) you will want to generate a 2048 bit or 1024 bit Diffie-Hellman Key and add it to your server certificate. However, if you support a 1024 bit DH key you should also be aware of the Logjam attack. You can accommodate these clients easily by adding a DH key of the appropriate size, but first carefully consider which clients you want to support.

Solution 3

Hi sorry for answering SOOO OLD thread, but the main point in "NOT" creating 4096 cert is, your CA cert will be 2048, so creating sub cert 4096 is pointless... when even having 2049 bit long cert will make attacker attack your CA cert instead yours.