Best way run a command on each file in a directory tree
Solution 1
find . -exec <command> {} \;
for the current directory as the root of the tree or in general:
find <directory> -exec <command> {} \;
Solution 2
Use the -print0
option to find and the -0
option to xargs
if you have file or directory names with spaces:
find {dir} -print0 | xargs -0r {command}
The -print0
option to find prints out the filenames as a NUL
-separated rather than whitespace separated list, while the -0
option to xargs
instructs it to break its input on NUL
rather than whitespace. Since NUL
is one of the characters that is not allowed in Unix filenames, there is no way for it to be mistaken for part of a filename.
The -r
option is there so that xargs
won't give you an error if it has no input.
Solution 3
If portability is an issue I would stay away from shell-specific ways of doing it (there are lots of people using lots of different shells, but in general find and xargs are really basic tools that no one would dare change in a radical way).
Using basic arguments of find and xargs should give you a more portable solution.
Solution 4
If grouping arguments together is acceptable, find | xargs will probably give better performance, since it will execute the command a lot fewer times than find -exec. If you want to execute the command each time for each file or execute in the subdirectory of the file you should probably use find -exec or -execdir.
As a rule, it's preferable to stay away from shell-specific loops; find & xargs are enough for most scenarios.
Solution 5
Make sure the version of the command you're using doesn't already have a flag for recursive operation. :)
Related videos on Youtube
Brian Lyttle
Updated on September 17, 2022Comments
-
Brian Lyttle almost 2 years
There appear be a number of ways to do this including loops in shell script, find and xargs. Which of these is best, and which is most portable?
-
Hemant almost 14 yearson some systems find dont have -exec option there you can use find . | xargs <Command>
-
Admin almost 14 yearsIndeed, and if you need to filter by something, try
-name "*.c"
or for example-type d
for directories... -
Lucas Jones almost 14 yearsFind can do surprisingly complex things - you might want to check the man page - unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?find - for the full option list.
-
Shawn Chin almost 14 yearsYou might also want to watch out for filenames with spaces, which may break the -exec and xargs approach. See tinyurl.com/ygvgmw5
-
ElBel almost 14 years-1 Won't work for filenames containing spaces. Better use find -print0 | xargs -0.
-
vonbrand over 11 yearsIf possible, use the
find ... | xargs ...
idiom, it processes files in batches, and this will usually be faster (less processes launched).