Best way to implement Single-Sign-On with all major providers?

18,054

Solution 1

As original author of this answer, I want to note that I regard it as OUTDATED. Since most providers decided to exclusively implement Oauth instead of Openid. Newer Openid services will also likely use openid connect, which is based on oauth. There are good libraries like for example: https://github.com/hybridauth/hybridauth

After the discussion of the already existing answer i sum up:

Almost every major provider is an openid provider / endpoint including Google, Yahoo, Aol.

Some of them requrie the user to specify the username to construct the openid endpoint. Some of them (the ones mentioned above) do have discovery urls, where the user id is automatically returned so that the user only has to click. (i would be glad if someone could explain the technical background)

However the only pain in the ass is Facebook, because they have their Facebook connect where they use an adapted version of OAuth for authentication.

Now what I did for my project is to set up an openid provider that authenticates the user with the credentials of my facebook Application - so the user gets connected to my application - and returns a user id that looks like:

http://my-facebook-openid-proxy-subdomain.mydomain.com/?id=facebook-user-id

I also configured it to fetch email adress and name and return it as AX attributes.

So my website just has to implement opend id and i am fine :)

I build it upon the classes you can find here: http://gitorious.org/lightopenid

In my index.php file i just call it like this:

<?php
require 'LightOpenIDProvider.php';
require 'FacebookProvider.php';
$op = new FacebookProvider;
$op->appid = 148906418456860; // your facebook app id
$op->secret = 'mysecret'; // your facebook app secret
$op->baseurl = 'http://fbopenid.2xfun.com'; // needs to be allowed by facebook
$op->server();
?>

and the source code of FacebookProvider.php follows:

<?php
class FacebookProvider extends LightOpenIDProvider
{
    public $appid = "";
    public $appsecret = "";
    public $baseurl = "";

    // i have really no idea what this is for. just copied it from the example.
    public $select_id = true;

    function __construct() {

        $this->baseurl = rtrim($this->baseurl,'/'); // no trailing slash as it will be concatenated with
                                                    // request uri wich has leading slash

        parent::__construct();

        # If we use select_id, we must disable it for identity pages,
        # so that an RP can discover it and get proper data (i.e. without select_id)
        if(isset($_GET['id'])) {
            // i have really no idea what happens here. works with or without! just copied it from the example.
            $this->select_id = false;
        }
    }

    function setup($identity, $realm, $assoc_handle, $attributes)
    {
        // here we should check the requested attributes and adjust the scope param accordingly
        // for now i just hardcoded email
        $attributes = base64_encode(serialize($attributes));    

        $url = "https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/authorize?client_id=".$this->appid."&redirect_uri=";

        $redirecturl = urlencode($this->baseurl.$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'].'&attributes='.$attributes);
        $url .= $redirecturl;
        $url .= "&display=popup";
        $url .= "&scope=email";
        header("Location: $url");
        exit();        

    }

    function checkid($realm, &$attributes)
    {
        // try authenticating
        $code = isset($_GET["code"]) ? $_GET["code"] : false;
        if(!$code) {
            // user has not authenticated yet, lets return false so setup redirects him to facebook
            return false;
        }

        // we have the code parameter set so it looks like the user authenticated
        $url = "https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/access_token?client_id=148906418456860&redirect_uri=";

        $redirecturl = ($this->baseurl.$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']);
        $redirecturl = strstr($redirecturl, '&code', true);
        $redirecturl = urlencode($redirecturl);     
        $url .= $redirecturl;
        $url .= "&client_secret=".$this->secret;
        $url .= "&code=".$code;
        $data = $this->get_data($url);

        parse_str($data,$data);

        $token = $data['access_token'];

        $data = $this->get_data('https://graph.facebook.com/me?access_token='.urlencode($token));
        $data = json_decode($data);

        $id = $data->id;
        $email = $data->email;
        $attribute_map = array(
            'namePerson/friendly' => 'name', // we should parse the facebook link to get the nickname
            'contact/email' => 'email',
        );

        if($id > 0) {

            $requested_attributes = unserialize(base64_decode($_GET["attributes"]));

            // lets be nice and return everything we can
            $requested_attributes = array_merge($requested_attributes['required'],$requested_attributes['optional']);
            $attributes = array();
            foreach($requested_attributes as $requsted_attribute) {
                if(!isset($data->{$attribute_map[$requsted_attribute]})) {
                    continue; // unknown attribute
                }
                $attributes[$requsted_attribute] = $data->{$attribute_map[$requsted_attribute]};    
            }

            // yeah authenticated!
            return $this->serverLocation . '?id=' . $id ;
        }
        die('login failed'); // die so we dont retry bouncing back to facebook
        return false;
    }
    function get_data($url) { 
      $ch = curl_init();
      $timeout = 5;
      curl_setopt($ch,CURLOPT_URL,$url);
      curl_setopt($ch,CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER,1);
      curl_setopt($ch,CURLOPT_CONNECTTIMEOUT,$timeout);
      $data = curl_exec($ch);
      curl_close($ch);
      return $data;
    }    

}

Its just a first working version (quick and dirty) Some dynamic stuff is hardcoded to my needs. It should show how and that it can be done. I am happy if someone picks up and improves it or re writes it or whatever :)

Well i consider this question answered

but I add a bounty just to get discussion. I would like to know what you think of my solution.

I will award the bounty to the best answer/comment beside this one.

Solution 2

OpenID is going to be your best bet for this application. It is supported by many, providers:

  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • MyOpenID
  • AOL

The Only problem is that twitter has not implemented OpenID yet. This is probably due to the fact that they are a proprietery based company, so they wanted their 'own' solution.

To solve that solution, you might write a wrapper class to provide compatibility with OpenID, but the chance is that even if your users don't have a twitter account, they might have a Facebook, Google, or Yahoo account.

Facebook Supports oauth, so you will have to port oauth to OpenID

Some PHP libraries for OpenID can be found here.

Now, some questions have been raised about facebook being an oauth provider.

Their oauth URL is "https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/authorize"

If you still do not belive me, then you can look at this javascript file, where I got that URL. If you don't believe that javascript file, then notice that it is hosted by stackexchange, the provider of this site. Now you must beleive that.

Solution 3

Fast forward two years and the answer of "OpenID is the answer" appears to be falling by the wayside by a number of the big providers. Most of the major third-party integration sites seem to have moved onto some flavor of OAuth (usually OAuth2). Also, if you don't mind NOT using OpenID/OAuth, there is a now complete SSO solution written in PHP (Disclaimer and full disclosure: This product is developed and maintained by myself under the CubicleSoft banner):

Single Sign-On Server/Client

Which didn't exist when this question was originally asked. It has a liberal license (MIT or LGPL) and meets your requirement of being an abstraction layer. The project tends to be focused toward enterprise sign ins but has some social media sign ins in the mix too (Google and Facebook).

You might also want to look at HybridAuth, which is only focused on social media sign ins but is more of a library than a prebuilt solution that you can throw onto a server and be done with it. So there is a bit more work involved with setting it up. It really depends on what you are after.

If you are happy with your OpenID solution, then great, but there are more options today than there were two years ago and people are still finding this thread.

Share:
18,054
The Surrican
Author by

The Surrican

Updated on June 28, 2022

Comments

  • The Surrican
    The Surrican almost 2 years

    I already did a lot of research on this topic and have implemented a lot of solutions myself.

    Including OpenID, Facebook Connect (using the old Rest API and the new Graph OAuth 2.0 API), Sign in with twitter (which has been upgraded to fully qualified OpenID by now as far as I know), and so on...

    But what I'm still missing is the perfect all in one solution.

    During my research I stumbled about some interesting projects:

    But I don't want to rely on an external provider and I would like a free solution as well, so I am not limited in implementation.

    I have also seen developers implementing one service after another dutifully following the providers instructions and setting up models and database tables for everything.

    Of course this will work but it is a shitload of work and always needs development and changes in your application etc.

    What I am looking for is an abstraction layer that takes all the services out there to one standard that can be integrated in my website. Once a new service appears I only want to add one model that deals with the abstraction of that specific provider so I can seamlessly integrate it into my application.

    Or better, find an already existing solution that I can just dowonload.

    Ideally this abstraction service would be hosted independently from my application so it can be used for several applications and be upgraded independently.

    The last of the 3 solutions above looks promising from the concept. Everything is just ported to an synthetic OpenID, and the website jut has to implement OpenID.

    After a while i found Django socialauth, a python based authentication system for the Django Webframework. But it looks like it operates as described above and i think this is the same login system that Stackoverflow uses (or at least some modified fork...).

    I downloaded it and tried to set it up and to see whether it could be set up as a standalone solution but I had no luck, as I am not so into python either.

    I would love a PHP based solution.

    So after this long text my question precisely is:

    • How would you implement SSO, any better idea than porting everything and have OpenID as basis?
    • What are the pros and cons of that?
    • Do you know any already existing solutions? Preferrably open source.

    I hope this question is not too subjective, thanks in advance.

    Update: I concluded that building a proxy / wrapper or what you might call it for Facebook, to port it to an OpenID so it becomes an OpenID endpoint / provider would be the best option. So that exactly what i did.

    Please see my answer below.

    I added the bounty to get feedback/discussion on it. Maby my approach is not so good as i currently think it is!

  • The Surrican
    The Surrican over 13 years
    Maby I overlook something but when it comes to Facebook and OpenID it looks to me like the only possibility is to link an OpenId account to your Facebook account. What I want is that people can authenticate on MY site with their facebook account. I didn't find ANY resources on that? Maby you can point me in the right direction or provide me with a link?
  • xaav
    xaav over 13 years
    Facebook is an OpenID provider. I posted a link in the answer, if you look at the list of providers, facebook is a link.
  • xaav
    xaav over 13 years
    I have edited the question to make it more clear about Facebook
  • zerkms
    zerkms over 13 years
    @geoff: OpenID != OAuth. Try for example to authenticate stackoverflow.com using the facebook "openid" url you've posted.
  • The Surrican
    The Surrican over 13 years
    zermks is right. my gess is that stackoverflow is essentially implementing oauth 2.0 but is porting it to an openid by beeing an openid provider itself... kinda like anyopenid. i never set up an openid provider and i think its rather and i am sure such a realisation must be available somewhere...
  • xaav
    xaav over 13 years
    Sorry about the confusion. Zerkms is right. I was confused by the facebook post that stated that they supported OpenID. Looks like you will have to implement it yourself. See here: stackoverflow.com/questions/76184/…
  • ͢bts
    ͢bts about 12 years
    It might be safer to store the appid as a string: that's one big fat dangerous integer $op->appid = '148906418456860';
  • The Surrican
    The Surrican about 12 years
    true ;) common "mistake".. however i tend to throw a "please upgrade to 64 bit" exception :P
  • Andrew Barber
    Andrew Barber over 11 years
    Thanks for posting your answer! Please be sure to read the FAQ on Self-Promotion carefully. In particular note that it is required that you post a disclaimer every time you link to your own site/product, and that your primary reason for being here should not be the promotion of your product(s)/website.
  • The Surrican
    The Surrican over 9 years
    i think its probably worth mentioning that at the time this answer was created it was baiscally right, however the course of history wanted it that oauth is the winner over openid... so it would probably be better to focus on that.