C - Determining which delimiter used - strtok()

14,593

Solution 1

Important: strtok is not re-entrant, you should use strtok_r instead of it.

You can do it by saving a copy of the original string, and looking into offsets of the current token into that copy:

char str[] = "Hello there; How are you? / I'm good - End";
char *copy = strdup(str);
char *delim = ";-/";
char *res = strtok( str, delim );
while (res) {
    printf("%c\n", copy[res-str+strlen(res)]);
    res = strtok( NULL, delim );
}
free(copy);

This prints

;
/
-

Demo #1

EDIT: Handling multiple delimiters

If you need to handle multiple delimiters, determining the length of the current sequence of delimiters becomes slightly harder: now you need to find the next token before deciding how long is the sequence of delimiters. The math is not complicated, as long as you remember that NULL requires special treatment:

char str[] = "(20*(5+(7*2)))+((2+8)*(3+6*9))";
char *copy = strdup(str);
char *delim = "*+()";
char *res = strtok( str, delim );
while (res) {
    int from = res-str+strlen(res);
    res = strtok( NULL, delim );
    int to = res != NULL ? res-str : strlen(copy);
    printf("%.*s\n", to-from, copy+from);
}
free(copy);

Demo #2

Solution 2

You can't. strtok overwrites the next separator character with a nul character (in order to terminate the token that it's returning this time), and it doesn't store the previous value that it overwrites. The first time you call strtok on your example string, the ; is gone forever.

You could do something if you keep an unmodified copy of the string you're modifying with strtok - given the index of the nul terminator for your current token (relative to the start of the string), you can look at the same index in the copy and see what was there.

That might be worse than just writing your own code to separate the string, of course. You can use strpbrk or strcspn, if you can live with the resulting token not being nul-terminated for you.

Solution 3

man 3 strtok

The strtok() and strtok_r() functions return a pointer to the beginning of each subsequent token in the string, after replacing the token itself with a NUL character. When no more tokens remain, a null pointer is returned.

But with a little pointer arithmetic you can do something like:

char* string = "Hello,World!";
char* dup = strdup(string);

char* world = strtok(string, ",");
char delim_used = dup[world - string];

free(dup);
Share:
14,593
Andrew Backes
Author by

Andrew Backes

Updated on July 18, 2022

Comments

  • Andrew Backes
    Andrew Backes almost 2 years

    Let's say I'm using strtok() like this..

    char *token = strtok(input, ";-/");
    

    Is there a way to figure out which token actually gets used? For instance, if the inputs was something like:

    Hello there; How are you? / I'm good - End

    Can I figure out which delimiter was used for each token? I need to be able to output a specific message, depending on the delimiter that followed the token.

  • Andrew Backes
    Andrew Backes almost 12 years
    Thank you, this is the kind of behavior I was hoping to achieve.
  • David
    David over 8 years
    @dasblinkenlight, this wont work if your have multiple separator in succession. e.g consider tokenization of arithmetic expression 20*5+(7*2) where you define your delim as "+-/*()" and you are interested in tokenization of operator and operands. +( will not be tokenized correctly.
  • Sergey Kalinichenko
    Sergey Kalinichenko over 8 years
    @David You are right, the code assumes there is always one delimiter. However, there is an easy fix for that - all you need to do is to get the next token to decide how long is the current run of delimiters (see the edit and the demo).
  • David
    David over 8 years
    @dasblinkenlight Thanks . it works but it still misses the leading delimiters. think if you want to evaluate the expression you need all the delimiters (including the leading one). Also you have to split the delimiters again as it is printing multiple delimiter together. I found out writing custom tokenizer by using find_first_of() or find_first_not_of() is much cleaner. Also boost tokens() class achieve this nicely.
  • David
    David over 8 years