can I pass a custom property to NLOG and output to file?

23,179

Solution 1

Event properties (used to be called event-context) would be the built-in way to do what you want. If you are using NLog 3.2+ you can use the fluent api, which may be a bit more appealing than creating LogEventInfo objects. You can access this api by by using the namespace NLog.Fluent.

Your layout would then be defined like this:

${event-properties:item=ID} ${date} ${Level} ${Message}

Then using the fluent api, log like this:

_logger.Debug()
    .Message("My name is {0}", "Ed")
    .Property("ID", 87)
    .Write();

Other than setting properties per event as above, the only other option would be to set properties per thread using MDC or MDLS.

NLog dosen't have a way (that I have found) of setting per-logger properties. Internally, NLog caches Logger instances by logger name, but does not guarantee that the same instance of Logger will always be returned for a given logger name. So for example if you call LogManager.GetCurrentClassLogger() in the constructor of your class, most of the time you will get back the same instance of Logger for all instances of your class. In which case, you would not be able to have separate values on your logger, per instance of your class.

Perhaps you could create a logging helper class that you can instantiate in your class. The helper class can be initialized with per-instance property values to be logged with every message. The helper class would also provide convenience methods to log messages as above, but with one line of code. Something like this:

// Example of a class that needs to use logging
public class MyClass
{
    private LoggerHelper _logger;

    public MyClass(int id)
    {
        _logger = new LoggerHelper(LogManager.GetCurrentClassLogger());

        // Per-instance values
        _logger.Set("ID", id);
    }

    public void DoStuff()
    {
        _logger.Debug("My name is {0}", "Ed");
    }
}


// Example of a "stateful" logger
public class LoggerHelper
{
    private Logger _logger;
    private Dictionary<string, object> _properties;


    public LoggerHelper(Logger logger)
    {
        _logger = logger;
        _properties = new Dictionary<string, object>();
    }

    public void Set(string key, object value)
    {
        _properties.Add(key, value);
    }

    public void Debug(string format, params object[] args)
    {
        _logger.Debug()
            .Message(format, args)
            .Properties(_properties)
            .Write();
    }
}

This would work with the same layout as above.

Solution 2

NLog 4.5 supports structured logging using message templates:

logger.Info("Logon by {user} from {ip_address}", "Kenny", "127.0.0.1");

See also https://github.com/NLog/NLog/wiki/How-to-use-structured-logging

See also https://github.com/NLog/NLog.Extensions.Logging/wiki/NLog-properties-with-Microsoft-Extension-Logging

Solution 3

Use MDLC Layout Renderer

MappedDiagnosticsLogicalContext.Set("PropertyName", "PropertyValue"); MappedDiagnosticsLogicalContext.Set("PropertyName2", "AnotherPropertyValue");

In your nlog config:

${mdlc:item=PropertyName} ${mdlc:item=PropertyName2}

https://github.com/NLog/NLog/wiki/MDLC-Layout-Renderer

Share:
23,179
Ed Landau
Author by

Ed Landau

Updated on July 11, 2022

Comments

  • Ed Landau
    Ed Landau almost 2 years

    EDIT 4: "From" seems to be a reserved word in NLog. Changing it "FromID" worked. this is an awesome way to pass variables to NLog and still keep your code clean !!!! THANK MIKE!!!

    EDIT 3. I really like this idea.:

    Implemented a helper class as Mike suggested below:

    public class NLogHelper
    {
        //
        // Class Properties
        //
        private Logger m_logger;
        private Dictionary<string, object> m_properties;
    
    
        //
        // Constructor
        //
        public NLogHelper(Logger logger)
        {
            m_logger = logger;
            m_properties = new Dictionary<string, object>();
        }
    
        //
        // Setting Logger properties per instancce
        //
        public void Set(string key, object value)
        {
            m_properties.Add(key, value);
        }
    
        //
        // Loggers
        //
        public void Debug(string format, params object[] args)
        {
            m_logger.Debug()
                .Message(format, args)
                .Properties(m_properties)
                .Write();
        }
    

    and in my main code, I have:

        private NLogHelper m_logger;
        public void Start() 
        {
            m_logger = new NLogHelper(LogManager.GetCurrentClassLogger());
            m_logger.Set("From", "QRT123");  // Class setting.
            m_logger.Debug("Hello ");
        }
    

    And the target set in the config file as follows:

    <target xsi:type="File"
        name ="LogFile" fileName="C:\QRT\Logs\QRTLog-${shortdate}.log"
        layout ="${date}|${level}|${event-properties:item=From}|${message} "/>
    

    But the output has a BLANK in the place of the 'from' property ???

    So I'm ALMOST THERE... but it does not seem to work??

    EDIT 2: I am now trying to create my own version of the NLog call:

    private void Log_Debug (string Message) 
    {
       LogEventInfo theEvent = new LogEventInfo(LogLevel.Debug, "What is this?", Message);
       theEvent.Properties["EmployeeID"] = m_employeeID;
       m_logger.Log(theEvent);
    }
    

    The issue is that I have to format the string for the calls (but a huge performance deal)... but this seems like a hack??

    Ideally, I would declare properties in the custom layout renderer and instead of setting those properties in the configuration file, each instance of my class would have the property set... something like [ID = m_ID] for the whole class. This way whenever a NLog is called from that class, the ID property is set and NLog's custom layout renderer can use this property to output it. Am I making sense??

    I'm new to NLog and have been looking at custom renderers. Basically, my goal is to have my log statements be: _logger.Debug ("My Name is {0}", "Ed", ID=87);

    and I'd like my rendered to be something like: layout = ${ID} ${date} ${Level} ${Message}

    That's it. ${ID} can have a default value of 0. fine. But ideally, I'd like every call to have the ability to specify an ID without needing to have 3 lines everytime I want to log.

    I've seen custom renderers allowing me to customize what I output but i'm not sure how I can customize the properties I pass to it without

    https://github.com/NLog/NLog/wiki/Extending%20NLog shows how I can add properties but I don't know how to call them.

    Also, https://github.com/NLog/NLog/wiki/Event-Context-Layout-Renderer shows how I can set custom properties but that involved the creation of a LogEventInfo object every time I want to log something.

    Nlog Custom layoutrenderer shows how to customize the output.. again... not how to customize the inputs.

    This is for a Console app in C# targeting .NET 4.0 using VS2013

    Thanks -Ed

  • Ed Landau
    Ed Landau over 8 years
    Wow. Interesting. I love the idea because I can set the Env Variable once. Right now, I was working with a LogEventInfo (I edited the question above to add this)... but this is very messy... I do need thread-safe though...
  • Ed Landau
    Ed Landau over 8 years
    thank you ! I will try implementing the helper so I can keep my code readable. do you think this will impact performance? Because of all the calls to a helper class?
  • Ed Landau
    Ed Landau over 8 years
    Hi Mike: I implemented your suggestion but it does not seem to work? I get a blank in the spot I'd expect the new property. I've provided my code above in "EDIT 3". i made sure I spelled the property correctly... 'not sure what's going on here. No compile issued etc.
  • Ed Landau
    Ed Landau over 8 years
    Got it to work. "From" seems to be a reserved word. I changed it to FromID and it worked!
  • Mike Hixson
    Mike Hixson over 8 years
    There wouldn't be a noticeable decrease in performance from using a helper class in this way. However, there is a potential for some different performance characteristics in using NLog's fluent API vs. the standard API.
  • Ed Landau
    Ed Landau over 8 years
    The example above DOES use the fluent API (or at least, that's the only way I got the syntax above to work).
  • Mike Hixson
    Mike Hixson over 8 years
    Right. And thats the only part of the solution that I would have concerns about performance. I havent noticed any issues in my use of it however.
  • KevinBui
    KevinBui almost 4 years
    use string interpolation in C# 6.0 logger.Info($"Logon by {"Kenny"} from ${"127.0.0.1"}");
  • Rolf Kristensen
    Rolf Kristensen almost 4 years
    @KevinBui The idea is not to use string-interpolation but message-templates: messagetemplates.org
  • Ak777
    Ak777 almost 4 years
    I have no idea why it was rated low. Honestly with the nlog unable to log {aspnet-user-identity} as it currently logs as empty value, in asp.netcore 2.2 web api, this is the solution i was able to achieve. I have no clue why the HttpContext.User.Identity is not being rendered by that layout property but this trick works for me.
  • Jürgen Steinblock
    Jürgen Steinblock almost 4 years
    @Ak777 It might look like this works for you. However, since this sets the variable on a process level, it could happen that, between a call to Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable and the actual logger.Debug(...) call another thread already updated the value and you log the wrong user. For a simple console or windows app this can be really helpful, but use it with caution in web projects.
  • Denise Skidmore
    Denise Skidmore over 2 years
    Thread safe is increasingly important the more users are on your site, this might work perfectly fine in the dev environment, but would be useless in production. You could get away with it if you put it inside a subfunction with a lock statement, but then you could have performance issues when every log statement is waiting on other log statements.
  • Jürgen Steinblock
    Jürgen Steinblock over 2 years
    @DeniseSkidmore True, that's why you shouldn't use this approach in a webapp. I use this in a bootstrapper application that has no reference to nlog but loads the real application via reflection and it is guaranteed that at this moment the app only runs a single thread. This way I can extend my logging with usefull information.