Can you inline static member functions?
Solution 1
The compiler chooses what it wants to do so we can't say what it will choose to do. That said, the function being static
will not prevent it from being inlined; static
functions are basically free functions with a different naming style and access to the class' private members.
Solution 2
A static member method has no this
parameter, and can therefore only access static member variables.
It is distinct from whether the method is inlined or not. So the two are independent of each other.
The compiler decides if a method is going to be inlined or not. Your use of the keyword is merely a hint to the compiler.
Related videos on Youtube
John
for (int i = 10; i < 40; ++i) { learnSomething(); codeSomething(); writeSomething(); }
Updated on June 05, 2022Comments
-
John about 2 years
I have a static member function which is merely syntactic sugar for me and I would like its body to appear in place of going through the motions of passing parameters to it. Will
inline static foo(int a) {return a & 0x00000040;}
be inlined just as it would if it was
inline
without beingstatic
?-
Kerrek SB over 12 yearsAs with any inlining, the answer is "it depends". What if you want to pass a function pointer to
foo
somewhere?
-
-
John over 12 yearsThey differ from free functions in one important respect: access to private members
-
Seth Carnegie over 12 years@John ah yes, that is an important difference.
-
Admin over 8 yearsDoesn't a definition inside the class imply a request to inline anyway?