Combine awaitables like Promise.all

38,050

Solution 1

The equivalent would be using asyncio.gather:

import asyncio

async def bar(i):
  print('started', i)
  await asyncio.sleep(1)
  print('finished', i)

async def main():
  await asyncio.gather(*[bar(i) for i in range(10)])

loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
loop.run_until_complete(main())
loop.close()

Why doesn't my approach work?

Because when you await each item in seq, you block that coroutine. So in essence, you have synchronous code masquerading as async. If you really wanted to, you could implement your own version of asyncio.gather using loop.create_task or asyncio.ensure_future.

EDIT

The original answer used the lower-level asyncio.wait.

Solution 2

I noticed that asyncio.gather() may be a better way to await other than asyncio.wait() if we want ordered results.

As the docs indicates, the order of result values from asyncio.gather() method corresponds to the order of awaitables in aws. However, the order of result values from asyncio.wait() won't do the same thing.You can test it.

Solution 3

https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#asyncio.gather

asyncio.gather() will return the list of output from each async function calls.

import asyncio

async def bar(i):
    print('started', i)
    await asyncio.sleep(1)
    print('finished', i)
    return i

async def main():
    values = await asyncio.gather(*[bar(i) for i in range(10)])
    print(values)

asyncio.run(main())

This method, gather, takes arbitrary number of args for the concurrent jobs instead of a list, so we unpack.

It's very common to need this intermediate value, values in my eg, instead of designing your function/method to have side effects.

Share:
38,050

Related videos on Youtube

Tamas Hegedus
Author by

Tamas Hegedus

I am an enthusiastic computer scientist. #SOreadytohelp

Updated on March 08, 2022

Comments

  • Tamas Hegedus
    Tamas Hegedus about 2 years

    In asynchronous JavaScript, it is easy to run tasks in parallel and wait for all of them to complete using Promise.all:

    async function bar(i) {
      console.log('started', i);
      await delay(1000);
      console.log('finished', i);
    }
    
    async function foo() {
        await Promise.all([bar(1), bar(2)]);
    }
    
    // This works too:
    async function my_all(promises) {
        for (let p of promises) await p;
    }
    
    async function foo() {
        await my_all([bar(1), bar(2), bar(3)]);
    }
    

    I tried to rewrite the latter in python:

    import asyncio
    
    async def bar(i):
      print('started', i)
      await asyncio.sleep(1)
      print('finished', i)
    
    async def aio_all(seq):
      for f in seq:
        await f
    
    async def main():
      await aio_all([bar(i) for i in range(10)])
    
    loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
    loop.run_until_complete(main())
    loop.close()
    

    But it executes my tasks sequentially.

    What is the simplest way to await multiple awaitables? Why doesn't my approach work?

  • Andrew Svetlov
    Andrew Svetlov over 8 years
    please mention asyncio.gather too
  • Thomas Ahle
    Thomas Ahle about 6 years
    Is the main difference between wait and gather that wait allows a timeout argument?
  • Rémi Benoit
    Rémi Benoit almost 3 years
    asyncio.wait is the more low level way of waiting. Also in 3.8 passing coroutines to wait directly is deprecated. Please rewrite your answer or update with a snippet using asyncio.gather as it's closer to Promise.all.
  • Jorge Tovar
    Jorge Tovar almost 2 years
    What's the difference if the function returns a value?