Combobox SelectedItem doesn't update when source changes
Solution 1
The object returned from your SubGroupingView must be "equal" to one of the objects in the ComboBox.Items (which means it must be in your Columns collection). So if you perform an "a.Equals(b)", it would need to return true.
If they are functionally the same, but not returning true when compared then that's your problem. You would need to either return the same object, or override the Equals method (and potentially the == and != operators).
If this is your issue, it's the same problem as in this question.
Solution 2
Is IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem
on your ComboBox
perhaps set to false
? You could try explicitly setting IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem="True"
and see if that helps.
TerrorAustralis
Interested in learning C#, VB.NET and starting with wCF applications.
Updated on July 17, 2022Comments
-
TerrorAustralis almost 2 years
I have a viewmodel which implement
INotifyPropertyChanged
. On this viewModel is a property calledSubGroupingView
. This property is bound to the selected item of a combo box. When i change the combo box, the source property is being updated fine, but when I change the source property or when the control is initialized, thecombobox.selectedItem
is NOT reflecting what exists in the property.
Here is some code to get you started:<ComboBox Grid.Column="3" Grid.Row="1" Margin="0,1,4,1" SelectedItem="{Binding Path=SubGroupingView, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged, Mode=TwoWay, diag:PresentationTraceSources.TraceLevel=High}" ItemsSource="{Binding Columns}" DisplayMemberPath="DisplayName">
The property raises the
PropertyChanged
event and the TraceSource output shows me that the binding detected it and transferred the value, its just that the combobox isn't reflecting it. Any ideas would be most welcome!EDIT:
output from the trace source is this:System.Windows.Data Warning: 91 : BindingExpression (hash=23631369): Got PropertyChanged event from ReportViewModel (hash=52844413) System.Windows.Data Warning: 97 : BindingExpression (hash=23631369): GetValue at level 0 from ReportViewModel (hash=52844413) using RuntimePropertyInfo(SubGroupingView): DataColumnViewModel (hash=58231222) System.Windows.Data Warning: 76 : BindingExpression (hash=23631369): TransferValue - got raw value DataColumnViewModel (hash=58231222) System.Windows.Data Warning: 80 : BindingExpression (hash=23631369): TransferValue - implicit converter produced DataColumnViewModel (hash=58231222) System.Windows.Data Warning: 85 : BindingExpression (hash=23631369): TransferValue - using final value DataColumnViewModel (hash=58231222)
Here is the code for the source property:
public class ReportViewModel : ViewModelBase, IReportTemplate { public DataColumnViewModel SubGroupingView { get { return GetViewModel(_report.SubGrouping); } set { if (_report.SubGrouping == value.ColumnName) return; _report.SubGrouping = value.ColumnName; RefreshDataSeries(); base.OnPropertyChanged("SubGroupingView"); base.OnPropertyChanged("IsReady"); } } }
Note:
ViewModelBase
implementsINotifyPropertyChange
.ANSWER
I overloaded the ==, != operators,GetHashCode()
, andEquals(object)
and now it is working nicely. Thanks for all of your help!-
Matt Hamilton over 13 yearsOut of interest, try setting the ItemsSource before the SelectedItem in your XAML declaration there.
-
TerrorAustralis over 13 yearsR u stalking me matt? no luck there
-
Mark Carpenter over 13 yearsInteresting... could you possibly post a snippet of your ViewModel (specifically the definition of SubGroupingView)?
-
Maxim Alexeyev over 13 yearsHow do you change source property? Is it really the object from the list, not any copy of it?
-
TerrorAustralis over 13 yearsSince its a ViewModel approach, the object is created. I will try using the Columns property of the list
-
TerrorAustralis over 13 yearsUsing an object from the list didnt work :(
-
-
TerrorAustralis over 13 yearsThanks mate, but no luck, If i set IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem, it doesnt fire of the setter on the source
-
TerrorAustralis over 13 yearsWELL worth the bounty! i'd vote you up even further if i could!! What implications does this have for MVVM? should all MVVM VMs implement a comparer on the base class? (cant award bounty for another three hours tho)
-
CodeNaked over 13 yearsIt's hard to say definitively, since every situation is different. If you're ViewModel isn't used in ItemsControls, then it may not matter if you override Equals. But you would run into the same sitution if you did a simple List<MyViewModel>.Contains(something). Since the Contains is performing an equality test also.
-
Dave about 11 yearsThis helped me when updating the list of items and the selected index stayed the same.
-
II ARROWS about 6 yearsIf I set it, I get "Failed to assign to property 'Windows.UI.Xaml.Controls.Primitives.Selector.IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem'." during initialize (It's an UWP application, the property was suggested by Intellisense, so it exists)