Compile to a stand-alone executable (.exe) in Visual Studio

309,176

Solution 1

Anything using the managed environment (which includes anything written in C# and VB.NET) requires the .NET framework. You can simply redistribute your .EXE in that scenario, but they'll need to install the appropriate framework if they don't already have it.

Solution 2

Inside your project folder their is a bin folder. Inside your bin folder, there are 2 folders, a Release and a Debug. For your polished .exe, you want to go into your Release folder.

I'm not quite sure if thats what youre asking

Solution 3

If I understand you correctly, yes you can, but not under Visual Studio (from what I know). To force the compiler to generate a real, standalone executable (which means you use C# like any other language) you use the program mkbundle (shipped with Mono). This will compile your C# app into a real, no dependency executable.

There is a lot of misconceptions about this around the internet. It does not defeat the purpose of the .net framework like some people state, because how can you lose future features of the .net framework if you havent used these features to begin with? And when you ship updates to your app, it's not exactly hard work to run it through the mkbundle processor before building your installer. There is also a speed benefit involved making your app run at native speed (because now it IS native).

In C++ or Delphi you have the same system, but without the middle MSIL layer. So if you use a namespace or sourcefile (called a unit under Delphi), then it's compiled and included in your final binary. So your final binary will be larger (Read: "Normal" size for a real app). The same goes for the parts of the framework you use in .net, these are also included in your app. However, smart linking does shave a conciderable amount.

Hope it helps!

Solution 4

I agree with @Marlon. When you compile your C# project with the Release configuration, you will find into the "bin/Release" folder of your project the executable of your application. This SHOULD work for a simple application.

But, if your application have any dependencies on some external dll, I suggest you to create a SetupProject with VisualStudio. Doing so, the project wizard will find all dependencies of your application and add them (the librairies) to the installation folder. Finally, all you will have to do is run the setup on the users computer and install your software.

Solution 5

You can embed all dlls in you main dll. See: Embedding DLLs in a compiled executable

Share:
309,176
Mohit Deshpande
Author by

Mohit Deshpande

I am a researcher at The Ohio State University in the field of computer vision and machine learning. I have worked as a mobile apps instructor for Zenva and current work as a writer for Zenva in machine learning.

Updated on December 04, 2020

Comments

  • Mohit Deshpande
    Mohit Deshpande over 3 years

    how can I make a stand-alone exe in Visual Studio. Its just a simple Console application that I think users would not like to install a tiny Console application. I compiled a simple cpp file using the visual studio command prompt. Will the exe work even if the .NET framework is not installed? I used native C++ code.

  • Mohit Deshpande
    Mohit Deshpande over 14 years
    Can I use C++/CLI or native C++ to compile it to an exe?
  • josesuero
    josesuero over 14 years
    It compiles to an exe no matter what. But if you try to run it it'll return an error if .NET isn't installed.
  • alex
    alex over 14 years
    I'm pretty sure that native, unmanaged C++ has nothing to do with .net. You can probably safely deploy it without having to worry about dependencies.
  • Joe
    Joe over 14 years
    You can use unmanaged C++ to avoid the .NET runtime dependency, but depending on the version of Visual Studio the user might need the appropriate Visual Studio runtime DLLs (unless you completely statically link, which is not always 100% easy to do correctly.)
  • rlb.usa
    rlb.usa over 12 years
    This worked for me too, cant believe how long I had to look until finding this.
  • intcreator
    intcreator over 8 years
    Note you will have to build the Release version by choosing the Release option under Build > Configuration Manager if it has not already been built.
  • corinjg
    corinjg over 5 years
    This comment seems to not apply to dotnet core users in 2019: it's a .dll in both bin/Debug and bin/Release directories
  • Jacob Sánchez
    Jacob Sánchez over 4 years
    bit hidden if you ask me
  • Skyfish
    Skyfish about 2 years
    Works for GUI apps too. If the application needs any non .NET dll(s), you will see them in the Release folder alongside the exe. Anywhere you copy your exe file you will need to copy the dll(s) to the same folder. As Joe said in his answer, the system that runs your exe must have a compatible .NET framework installed.