Debouncing button clicks using Rx
Note the following in the documentation on the debounce operator:
This variant operates by default on the computation Scheduler (...)
Or, code-wise, this currently happens:
public final Observable<T> debounce(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) {
return debounce(timeout, unit, Schedulers.computation());
}
As a result, the subscriber's callbacks are invoked on that same computation scheduler, since nothing is explicitly instructing otherwise.
Now, attempting to update a view (that's what's happening in onNext()
) from any other thread than the main/ui thread, is a mistake and it will lead to undetermined results.
Fortunately, the remainder of the quote above provides the solution too:
(...) but you can optionally pass in a Scheduler of your choosing as a third parameter.
This would lead to:
RxView.clicks(mButton)
.debounce(300, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS, AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.subscribe(...);
Alternatively, you can still let the debounce happen on the computation scheduler, but receive the notifications on the main/ui thread:
RxView.clicks(mButton)
.debounce(300, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.subscribe(...);
Either way will ensure that the notifications are received on the main/ui thread and thus that the view is updated from the correct thread.
Hadi Satrio
"Programmer-designer hybrid with a passion in OOP and mobile application development." Likes: Coffee, Clean Code, Android, Android Studio, ThinkPads, RxJava, MVP, Nexus, kitties. Dislikes: Cold coffee, unformatted codes.. oh and those butt-itch you got from sitting too long.
Updated on July 22, 2022Comments
-
Hadi Satrio almost 2 years
I'm trying to make a simple "button debouncer" which will count filtered clicks and display it thru a TextView. I want to filter rapid/spam clicks in a way that clicks with less than 300ms time-gap in-between are ignored.
I did my research and stumbled upon
Rx
's awesomedebounce()
which in theory should do the exact thing I wanted....or so I thought. As the app seemed to only register the first click; the counter won't increment no matter how long I tried to wait.
Here's a piece of my code:
... RxView.clicks(mButton) .debounce(300, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) .subscribe(new Subscriber<Object>() { public int mCount; @Override public void onCompleted() { } @Override public void onError(Throwable e) { } @Override public void onNext(Object o) { mText.setText(String.valueOf(++mCount)); } }); ...
What am I doing wrong? I've tried to run the thing without
debounce()
and it worked flawlessly (the counter will increment everytime the button got clicked).Thanks in advance!
-
wilddev about 7 yearsIt's better to use throttleFirst instead of debounce
-
MH. about 7 years@wilddev: whether it is "better" or not depends on the desired behaviour, as
throttleFirst
anddebounce
do not yield the same result. I originally interpreted the question to require debounce, but reading it again now, I agree that throttleFirst could also make sense. I guess that makes both good candidates. Regardless, both operate on the Computation scheduler, so most of above applies either way. :) -
wilddev about 7 yearsFor "better" I mean that in case of throttleFirst you've got click reaction immediately, but with debounce there is a delay. Just to inform others who will find this question later :)
-
MH. about 7 yearsTrue, but since
throttleFirst
is basically a specific flavour ofsample
, it will pass through every first item emitted within a certain periodic time interval.debounce
has different behaviour, because it only emits an item iff a particular timespan has passed without another item having been emitted. Subtle difference: timespan vs interval. This may or may not be relevant to a particular use case. Just be aware of this. -
superuser about 7 years@MH. In RxJava 1.x throttleFirst only uses computation scheduler's time for calculation, but result delivery remains the same as what immediate scheduler does, not checked Rx 2.x source.