Difference between PCDATA and CDATA in DTD

Question

What is the difference between #PCDATA and #CDATA in DTD?

Solution 1

PCDATA - Parsed Character Data

XML parsers normally parse all the text in an XML document.

CDATA - (Unparsed) Character Data

The term CDATA is used about text data that should not be parsed by the XML parser.

Characters like "<" and "&" are illegal in XML elements.

Solution 2

• PCDATA is text that will be parsed by a parser. Tags inside the text will be treated as markup and entities will be expanded.
• CDATA is text that will not be parsed by a parser. Tags inside the text will not be treated as markup and entities will not be expanded.

By default, everything is PCDATA. In the following example, ignoring the root, <bar> will be parsed, and it'll have no content, but one child.

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<foo>
<bar><test>content!</test></bar>
</foo>

When we want to specify that an element will only contain text, and no child elements, we use the keyword PCDATA, because this keyword specifies that the element must contain parsable character data – that is , any text except the characters less-than (<) , greater-than (>) , ampersand (&), quote(') and double quote (").

In the next example, <bar> contains CDATA. Its content will not be parsed and is thus <test>content!</test>.

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<foo>
<bar><![CDATA[<test>content!</test>]]></bar>
</foo>

There are several content models in SGML. The #PCDATA content model says that an element may contain plain text. The "parsed" part of it means that markup (including PIs, comments and SGML directives) in it is parsed instead of displayed as raw text. It also means that entity references are replaced.

Another type of content model allowing plain text contents is CDATA. In XML, the element content model may not implicitly be set to CDATA, but in SGML, it means that markup and entity references are ignored in the contents of the element. In attributes of CDATA type however, entity references are replaced.

In XML, #PCDATA is the only plain text content model. You use it if you at all want to allow text contents in the element. The CDATA content model may be used explicitly through the CDATA block markup in #PCDATA, but element contents may not be defined as CDATA per default.

In a DTD, the type of an attribute that contains text must be CDATA. The CDATA keyword in an attribute declaration has a different meaning than the CDATA section in an XML document. In a CDATA section all characters are legal (including <,>,&,' and " characters), except the ]]> end tag.

#PCDATA is not appropriate for the type of an attribute. It is used for the type of "leaf" text.

#PCDATA is prepended by a hash in the content model to distinguish this keyword from an element named PCDATA (which would be perfectly legal).

Solution 3

PCDATA – parsed character data. It parses all the data in an XML document.

Example:

<family>
    <mother>mom</mother>
    <father>dad</father>
</family>

Here, the <family> element contains 2 more elements: <mother> and <father>. So it parses further to get the text of mother and father to give the text value of family as “mom dad”

CDATA – unparsed character Data. This is the data that should not be parsed further in an xml document.

<family>
    <![CDATA[ 
       <mother>mom</mother>
       <father>dad</father>
    ]]>
</family>

Here, the text value of family will be <mother>mom</mother><father>dad</father>.

Solution 4

From here (Google is your friend):

In a DTD, PCDATA and CDATA are used to assert something about the allowable content of elements and attributes, respectively. In an element's content model, #PCDATA says that the element contains (may contain) "any old text." (With exceptions as noted below.) In an attribute's declaration, CDATA is one sort of constraint you can put on the attribute's allowable values (other sorts, all mutually exclusive, include ID, IDREF, and NMTOKEN). An attribute whose allowable values are CDATA can (like PCDATA in an element) contain "any old text."

A potentially really confusing issue is that there's another "CDATA," also referred to as marked sections. A marked section is a portion of element (#PCDATA) content delimited with special strings: to close it. If you remember that PCDATA is "parsed character data," a CDATA section is literally the same thing, without the "parsed." Parsers transmit the content of a marked section to downstream applications without hiccupping every time they encounter special characters like < and &. This is useful when you're coding a document that contains lots of those special characters (like scripts and code fragments); it's easier on data entry, and easier on reading, than the corresponding entity reference.

So you can infer that the exception to the "any old text" rule is that PCDATA cannot include any of these unescaped special characters, UNLESS they fall within the scope of a CDATA marked section.

Solution 5

The very main difference between PCDATA and CDATA is

PCDATA - Basically used for ELEMENTS while

CDATA - Used for Attributes of XML i.e ATTLIST

View more solutions