Email abuse reports for outbound.protection.outlook.com

5,451

Not much you can do, Microsoft does not use SPF and DMARC to reject, only mark the Spam Confidence Level accordingly and lets the customer decide.

You could message @tzink7 on twitter, he should know, but this is an old post and I doubt they fixed it yet. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/tzink/2015/01/09/an-update-on-dkim-on-ipv4-and-dmarc-in-office-365/

Essentially, O365 breaks email authentication (DMARC, DKIM, SPF, SPF, SPF, SPF)

Share:
5,451

Related videos on Youtube

CamaroSS
Author by

CamaroSS

Beginner . . .

Updated on September 18, 2022

Comments

  • CamaroSS
    CamaroSS almost 2 years

    I've recently set up a DMARC record for my domain and now I'm receiving email abuse reports from hotmail.com that state:

    This is an email abuse report for an email message received from IP 104.47.126.207 on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 07:20:43 -0800. The message below did not meet the sending domain's authentication policy.

    104.47.126.207 resolves to mail-pu1apc01hn0248.outbound.protection.outlook.com

    My SPF record is

    v=spf1 ip4:{my MX IP} -all

    So what does it mean? Does Hotmail try to relay an E-mail in some way? Should I worry about it?

    It also states that both SPF and DKIM checks have failed

    Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=fail (sender IP is 104.47.126.207; identity alignment result is pass and alignment mode is relaxed) [email protected]; dkim=fail (identity alignment result is pass and alignment mode is relaxed) header.d=domain.com; x-hmca=fail [email protected]

    UPDATE

    An e-mail attached to the abuse report is an automated notification to the customer that MUST be sent from my server.

    UPDATE

    These are the Received headers from the attached e-mail

    Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.126.228]) by COL004-MC5F8.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23143); Sun, 14 Feb 2016 06:00:47 -0800

    Received: from HK2PR03CA0006.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.165.52.16) by HKXPR03MB0568.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.161.50.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.403.16; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:00:43 +0000

    Received: from PU1APC01FT034.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7ebd::208) by HK2PR03CA0006.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:78f7::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.409.15 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:00:43 +0000

    Received: from BLU004-MC1F25.hotmail.com (10.152.252.54) by PU1APC01FT034.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.252.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.415.6 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:00:41 +0000

    Received: from domain.com ([{my MX IP}]) by BLU004-MC1F25.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23143); Sun, 14 Feb 2016 06:00:38 -0800

    • Michael Hampton
      Michael Hampton over 8 years
      Do you use Office 365?
    • CamaroSS
      CamaroSS over 8 years
      @Michael Hampton, no, and an e-mail attached to the abuse report is an automated notification to the customer that MUST be sent from my server. I've updated the question with "Received" headers from the e-mail. It shows that the message did originate from my server.
    • Michael Hampton
      Michael Hampton over 8 years
      Maybe your recipient is forwarding their mail somewhere?
    • CamaroSS
      CamaroSS over 8 years
      It might be possible. I've changed the SPF policy to ~all instead of -all, maybe it would help in such case.
    • Michael Hampton
      Michael Hampton over 8 years
      Yes, but it makes your SPF policy useless.
    • CamaroSS
      CamaroSS over 8 years
      Not quite, the tilde rule will result in a softfail which may be a classifying factor.