Exception Handling in case of Thread.sleep and wait() method in case of Threads
I was wondering how to handle the interrupted Exception that is thrown by Thread.sleep method and the Object Class's wait method
There are two important things to realize about InterruptedException
. First off, when it is thrown the interrupt flag on the Thread
is cleared. So you should always do something like:
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// re-add back in the interrupt bit
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
...
}
This is a very important pattern because it allows other code that might be calling yours to detect the interrupt as well.
Secondly, in terms of threads, if they are interrupted, they should most likely cleanup and quit. This is certainly up to you, the programmer, but the general behavior is to terminate and quit the operation being performed – often because the program is trying to shutdown.
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
// we are being interrupted so we should stop running
return;
}
Lastly, with any exception handling, the default Eclipse template is usually the wrong thing to do. Never just e.printStackTrace();
the exception. Figure out what you want to do with it: re-throw it as another exception, log it somewhere better, or exit the thread/method/application.
Comments
-
Sunny Gupta almost 2 years
I was trying to write a Producer Consumer model (Producer thread and Consumer Thread in java)
I was wondering how to handle the
InterruptedException
that is thrown byThread.sleep
method and theObject
Class'swait()
methodpackage producerconsumer; import java.util.ArrayList; public class Consumer implements Runnable { ArrayList<Integer> container; @Override public void run() { while(true){ System.out.println("Consumer Thread Running"); try { Thread.sleep(1000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } if(null==container){ System.out.println("container is null"); } //Removing values from Arraylist synchronized (container) { if(container.size()==0){ try { container.wait(); } catch (InterruptedException e) { //How to tackle this exception e.printStackTrace(); } } Integer removedInteger = container.remove(container.size()-1); System.out.println("removedInteger..."+removedInteger); } } } public void setContainer(ArrayList<Integer> container) { this.container = container; } }
This is one example I have taken, In this example there may not be any need to take care of these exception (My Assumption).
But I wanted to know what could be the different scenarios possible in which we need to handle this exception.
-
assylias about 12 yearspossible duplicate of Handling InterruptedException in Java
-
Sunny Gupta about 12 years@assylias Thanks for suggesting a good link. Let me look into this.
-
-
yshavit about 12 yearsAnother option is to just re-throw the exception (in which case you don't need to re-interrupt the thread).
-
Sunny Gupta about 12 years@Gray Thanks for putting it in an awesome manner. Just wanted to know if we re-throw this as another exception. Will my thread stop? or Will the loop carry on like nothing has happened.
-
Marko Topolnik about 12 yearsIt's simple Java semantics. There's absolutely no magic. Your call to
sleep
orwait
threw an exception. Execution continues just as if it were anIOException
from, say,InputStream.read
. -
Gray about 12 yearsAs Marko points out @SAM, the
InterruptedException
is a normalException
. If you catch it then execution of your thread continues. If you re-throw it as aRuntimeException
and the loop does not catch that exception then the thread will return fromrun()
and the thread will stop. Standard exception rules apply here. -
Admin over 10 yearsMy compiler says
wait()
never throwsInterruptedException
. Is that correct? Can I trust my compiler? ;)) -
Gray over 10 years
Object.wait()
does throwInterruptedException
. Maybe the method throwsException
or something that is masking it @Gracchus?