Go - passing generic struct to function
The Marshal function also receives its parameters as interface{}
therefore there's no way to detect if you are passing something invalid at compile time, it's all caught at runtime.
One thing you can do to check if an invalid type was passed to Marshal is to check the error type, Marshal returns an UnsupportedTypeError
when you try to Marshal an invalid type (like chan
or func
) so you can check for that error when Marshaling.
So you could try something like that:
if err != nil {
_, ok := err.(*json.UnsupportedTypeError)
if ok {
return []byte("Tried to Marshal Invalid Type")
} else {
return []byte("Venue does not exist")
}
}
Ralph King
Updated on June 22, 2022Comments
-
Ralph King almost 2 years
Considering the following code, which is responding to GET '/venues/:id':
func venueShow(w http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) { // get ID from params vars := mux.Vars(req) id := vars["id"] // initialise new struct var venue Venue // select by id and scan into struct db.First(&venue, id).Scan(&venue) // turn it to json response := structToJSON(&venue) // write headers and provide response w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json") w.Write(response) }
and:
func structToJSON (s interface{}) (response []byte) { // turn it into pretty-ish json response, err := json.MarshalIndent(&s, "", " ") if err != nil { return []byte("Venue does not exist") } // return the json as the reponse return response }
My structToJSON function is taking an empty interface as the argument, because I want to pass various different structs to the function and have them spewed out as JSON.
However, it doesn't strike me as very safe. If anything satisfies an empty interface, I could pass whatever I wanted into that function, and all sorts of errors might happen when json.Marshal tries to do it's business. This (I suppose) would be caught by the compiler rather than at runtime, but is there a safer way?
I could duplicate the structToJSON method for each different type of Struct/Model that I pass to it, but that's not very DRY.
Thanks
-
Ralph King over 8 yearsAh ok, didn't think of that. So there's no real problem with using an empty interface as an argument, as stuff in the standard library does it loads I suppose. Thanks. I'll mark this as correct!
-
hbejgel over 8 yearsYeah, sice go doesn't have generics and doesn't allow method overload we're pretty stuck passing
interface{}
as parameters.