How can I install Adobe Reader on Ubuntu 17.10

11,896

As stated on the german wiki, Adobe Reader is not in partner sources anymore. Instead it is recommended to install Acrobat DC via playonlinux.

sudo apt install playonlinux
playonlinux

click on "install a program" and wait for the list to get refreshed. Search for Acrobat as soon as it is finished:

playonlinux with acrobat reader.

You will be guided through the installation. It will take some time but after that you can run Acrobat DC via wine.

Edit: Errata

With current Ubuntu 17.10 and wine 1.9.0 Acrobat DC installation seems to be hanging.

There is a solution from Martin Bruvelis, the maintainer of the install recipe on playonlinux using wine 2.2.1 and the newest download link. It is not yet accepted as a working solution but it will probably the next days.

Download the install-script manually under the section "new sourcecode" revision 2017-11-20 11-38 published on 20 November 2017. Save it in your Downloads directory i.e. under acrobat_new.sh. Then install from the menu using "run local script":

local script menu

execute local script

Acrobat DC will install successfully:

enter image description here

Share:
11,896

Related videos on Youtube

Arya Sadeghi
Author by

Arya Sadeghi

Updated on September 18, 2022

Comments

  • Arya Sadeghi
    Arya Sadeghi almost 2 years

    I found an outdated solution for installing Adobe Reader here on askubuntu.

    I followed the steps but after updating my sources using sudo apt-get update I am getting the following error:

    Hit:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful InRelease
    Ign:2 http://archive.canonical.com precise InRelease
    Get:4 http://archive.canonical.com precise Release [8,180 B]            
    
    Get:5 http://archive.canonical.com precise Release.gpg [198 B]
    Ign:5 http://archive.canonical.com precise Release.gpg   
    Ign:3 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable InRelease
    Hit:6 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable Release
    Reading package lists... Done
    W: GPG error: http://archive.canonical.com precise Release: The 
    following signatures were invalid: 
    630239CC130E1A7FD81A27B140976EAF437D05B5
    E: The repository 'http://archive.canonical.com precise Release' is 
    not signed.
    N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is 
    therefore disabled by default.
    N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user 
    configuration details.
    

    What can I do to fix this and get Adobe Acrobat installed?

    The question itself is actually not a duplicate since OP wants to install Adobe Acrobat and the old solution was outdated.

  • Dr. Mike
    Dr. Mike over 6 years
    Unfortunately the latest PDF's created in Adobe cannot be read by evince. I just had this with a formal document issued by my bank. Sucks. Evince has been my goto program for PDF's for years now.
  • ukos
    ukos over 6 years
    It is essential for a pdf to work with Adobe Reader. Regardless of what the standard is. Adobe is that big. Same goes for the standard Apple pdf tool. We have a mac just for checking the correct output of latex generated pdf on a mac.
  • ukos
    ukos over 6 years
    What is wrong with wanting to install Adobe Acrobat?
  • Dr. Mike
    Dr. Mike over 6 years
    @ElderGeek I'll open a new question. :) Thanks for the suggestion.
  • Mike Wojtyna
    Mike Wojtyna over 6 years
    @ElderGeek Unfortunately Adobe Reader is required to handle interactive pdfs. That's the reason why I'm using it on my virtualbox.
  • Elder Geek
    Elder Geek over 6 years
    @MikeWojtyna Are you dealing with PDF files with Adobe proprietary extensions? I guess Adobe has thrown standards out the window along with backward compatibility. I agree, that is unfortunate.
  • Mike Wojtyna
    Mike Wojtyna over 6 years
    @ElderGeek Yes, we are forced to use that kind of PDFs to communicate with government institutions in Poland :(. One of the reasons why I still need to use Windows.
  • pattivacek
    pattivacek about 6 years
    The new version also hangs for me.
  • Animesh Srivastava
    Animesh Srivastava about 6 years
    @ElderGeek: The most compelling reason to install Adobe Reader is to be able to fill in PDF forms, which evince still can't do. There are government forms requiring this, which is really unbelievable in this day and age, but it's the way it is.
  • Elder Geek
    Elder Geek about 6 years
    @LifeBoy With all due respect, there are numerous ways to fill in PDF forms that don't require Adobe Reader. Somehow I've managed to get along without it for several years.
  • Animesh Srivastava
    Animesh Srivastava about 6 years
    Yes, @ElderGeek, I stand corrected. Indeed, both Evince (FOSS) and Master PDF Editor 4 (non-FOSS) do fill in forms now, which is good news. The local Tax authority (SARS) however, use a PDF form that pulls the contents from it's source once it's opened in Adobe Reader. I have not found any other way to read these unfortunately. Of course, I am of the opinion that no government should ever be allowed to use such software, but they do, and scoff at those objecting.
  • Elder Geek
    Elder Geek about 6 years
    @LifeBoy I'm a firm believer that all things are possible given enough time and effort. If the aforementioned document is freely available, perhaps asking a new question that includes a link to said document would allow for the development of alternate solutions. In such a case it would be prudent to link to related Q&A's explaining that they didn't work (and hopefully why) to provide context. This could help deter those that might otherwise close it as a duplicate.
  • Daniel Loureiro
    Daniel Loureiro almost 6 years
    Sorry, but you are wrong. There are a lot of reasons why to use AdobeReader instead of evince. For example, I need to fill some gov forms to my visa application. These forms don't render at all on evince, but work properly on Adobe.
  • Elder Geek
    Elder Geek almost 6 years
    @DanielLoureiro Of course if the form you are filling requires Adobe proprietary extensions your choices are much more limited. This clearly means that this is the wrong answer for you in the particular example you mention. This doesn't mean it's wrong for everyone. Many of us, myself included, get along quite fine with evince on a daily basis. Cheers!