How can I make an unordered set of pairs of integers in C++?
Solution 1
Your code compiles on VS2010 SP1 (VC10), but it fails to compile with GCC g++ 4.7.2.
However, you may want to consider boost::hash
from Boost.Functional to hash a std::pair
(with this addition, your code compiles also with g++).
#include <unordered_set>
#include <boost/functional/hash.hpp>
class A
{
private:
std::unordered_set<
std::pair<int, int>,
boost::hash< std::pair<int, int> >
> u_edge_;
};
Solution 2
There is no standard way of computing a hash on a pair. Add this definition to your file:
struct pair_hash {
inline std::size_t operator()(const std::pair<int,int> & v) const {
return v.first*31+v.second;
}
};
Now you can use it like this:
std::unordered_set< std::pair<int, int>, pair_hash> u_edge_;
This works, because pair<T1,T2>
defines equality. For custom classes that do not provide a way to test equality you may need to provide a separate function to test if two instances are equal to each other.
Of course this solution is limited to a pair of two integers. Here is a link to an answer that helps you define a more general way of making hash for multiple objects.
Solution 3
As already mentioned in most of the other answers on this question, you need to provide a hash function for std::pair<int, int>
. However, since C++11, you can also use a lambda expression instead of defining a hash function. The following code takes the solution given by Sergey as basis:
auto hash = [](const std::pair<int, int>& p){ return p.first * 31 + p.second; };
std::unordered_set<std::pair<int, int>, decltype(hash)> u_edge_(8, hash);
I'd like repeat Sergey's disclaimer: This solution is limited to a pair of two integers. This answer provides the idea for a more general solution.
Solution 4
OK here is a simple solution with guaranteed non collisions. Simply reduce your problem to an existing solution i.e. convert your pair of int
to string
like so:
auto stringify = [](const pair<int, int>& p, string sep = "-")-> string{
return to_string(p.first) + sep + to_string(p.second);
}
unordered_set<string> myset;
myset.insert(stringify(make_pair(1, 2)));
myset.insert(stringify(make_pair(3, 4)));
myset.insert(stringify(make_pair(5, 6)));
Enjoy!
Solution 5
You need to provide a specialization for std::hash<>
that works with std::pair<int, int>
. Here is a very simple example of how you could define the specialization:
#include <utility>
#include <unordered_set>
namespace std
{
template<>
struct hash<std::pair<int, int>>
{
size_t operator () (std::pair<int, int> const& p)
{
// A bad example of computing the hash,
// rather replace with something more clever
return (std::hash<int>()(p.first) + std::hash<int>()(p.second));
}
};
}
class A
{
private:
// This won't give you problems anymore
std::unordered_set< std::pair<int, int> > u_edge_;
};
Pippi
Updated on July 05, 2022Comments
-
Pippi almost 2 years
The following program does not compile an unordered set of pairs of integers, but it does for integers. Can
unordered_set
and its member functions be used on user-defined types, and how can I define it?#include <unordered_set> ... class A{ ... private: std::unordered_set< std::pair<int, int> > u_edge_; };
Compiler error:
error: no matching function for call to 'std::unordered_set >::unordered_set()'
-
Alex Chamberlain over 11 yearsYour functor should exten std::unary_function
-
juanchopanza over 11 years@AlexChamberlain I thought that stuff was deprecated.
-
Mike Seymour over 11 years@AlexChamberlain: Why should it do that? This class meets all the hash requirements.
-
Alex Chamberlain over 11 years@juanchopanza Fair enough, though I'm still working with C++03 at work.
-
Alex Chamberlain over 11 years@MikeSeymour Because you don't know who else will use your functors.
-
juanchopanza over 11 years@AlexChamberlain I know the feeling! But since the question deals with
std::unordered_set
I think it is safe to assume OP wants an C++11 solution. -
Brad Larson over 5 yearsComments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.