How do you get the all properties of a class and its base classes (up the hierarchy) with Reflection? (C#)

34,566

Solution 1

Use this:

PropertyInfo[] info = obj.GetType().GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance);

EDIT: Of course the correct answer is that of Jay. GetProperties() without parameters is equivalent to GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Static ). The BindingFlags.FlattenHierarchy plays no role here.

Solution 2

I don't think it's that complicated.

If you remove the BindingFlags parameter to GetProperties, I think you get the results you're looking for:

    class B
    {
        public int MyProperty { get; set; }
    }

    class C : B
    {
        public string MyProperty2 { get; set; }
    }

    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        PropertyInfo[] info = new C().GetType().GetProperties();
        foreach (var pi in info)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(pi.Name);
        }
    }

produces

    MyProperty2
    MyProperty

Solution 3

If you access Type.BaseType, you can get the base type. You can recursively access each base type and you'll know when you've hit the bottom when your type is System.Object.

Type type = obj.GetType();
PropertyInfo[] info = type.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public);
PropertyInfo[] baseProps = type.BaseType.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public);

Solution 4

I would tend to agree with Nicolas; unless you know you need reflection, then ComponentModel is a viable alternative, with the advantage that you will get the correct metadata even for runtime models (such as DataView/DataRowView).

For example:

    foreach (PropertyDescriptor prop in TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(obj))
    {
        Console.WriteLine("{0}={1}", prop.Name, prop.GetValue(obj));
    }

As an aside, you can also do some simple performance tricks with this; you can do the same with reflection and Delegate.CreateDelegate, but there is no centralised place to hide the logic away, unlike TypeDescriptor with a TypeDescriptionProvider (don't worry if these are unfamiliar; you can just use the code "as is" ;-p).

Solution 5

Use:

TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(obj);
Share:
34,566
Davy8
Author by

Davy8

Come work with me http://nerdery.com/workwithme/dv

Updated on July 09, 2022

Comments

  • Davy8
    Davy8 almost 2 years

    So what I have right now is something like this:

    PropertyInfo[] info = obj.GetType().GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public);
    

    where obj is some object.

    The problem is some of the properties I want aren't in obj.GetType() they're in one of the base classes further up. If I stop the debugger and look at obj, the I have to dig through a few "base" entries to see the properties I want to get at. Is there some binding flag I can set to have it return those or do I have to recursively dig through the Type.BaseType hierarchy and do GetProperties on all of them?

  • Davy8
    Davy8 over 15 years
    There were no top level properties in the object I was looking at, so I assumed that it was just trying to retrieve the top level ones when it returned nothing, when in fact it returned nothing because it was trying to get properties that were neither Static nor Instance.
  • argatxa
    argatxa about 15 years
    love you man. Good one. Why people have voted down this one?
  • Justjyde
    Justjyde almost 10 years
    Cool! Thanks for this. Saved the day for static member in base class.
  • Hassan Faghihi
    Hassan Faghihi almost 5 years
    I have a base class with some nonPublic field, when i call .GetProperties(BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Public) on that it return non public field, when i do on the child , it return only public fields /child fields, (child only contains public field, and parent contains fields which sets by system, so it's private)
  • Adam
    Adam about 2 years
    As per @HassanFaghihi's comment - this answer is incorrect, it only coincidentally works for public base-type / grand-base-type properties.
  • Panos
    Panos about 2 years
    @Adam probably the answer is incorrect - it is a 14-year old answer... But it does not work coincidentally - it works exactly as the OP wanted. Hassan asked a different question so he should get a different answer...
  • Hassan Faghihi
    Hassan Faghihi about 2 years
    @Panos at 14 years ago, we were using the .Net framework and no .Net standard or .Net core or .Net (alone) were there, so the sub-structure and behavior may differ from that time, or at least in other sub-systems. even the .Net Framework era itself splits into two parts of after .Net Framework 4 and before .Net Framework 4, and 2008 I believe there was .Net Framework 3.5... But no matter what still most of the code and behavior are identical