How do you validate uniqueness of a pair of ids in Ruby on Rails?
Solution 1
validates_uniqueness_of :user_id, :scope => [:question_id]
if you needed to include another column (or more), you can add that to the scope as well. Example:
validates_uniqueness_of :user_id, :scope => [:question_id, :some_third_column]
Solution 2
If using mysql, you can do it in the database using a unique index. It's something like:
add_index :question_votes, [:question_id, :user_id], :unique => true
This is going to raise an exception when you try to save a doubled-up combination of question_id/user_id, so you'll have to experiment and figure out which exception to catch and handle.
Solution 3
The best way is to use both, since rails isn't 100% reliable when uniqueness validation come thru.
You can use:
validates :user_id, uniqueness: { scope: :question_id }
and to be 100% on the safe side, add this validation on your db (MySQL ex)
add_index :question_votes, [:user_id, :question_id], unique: true
and then you can handle in your controller using:
rescue ActiveRecord::RecordNotUnique
So now you are 100% secure that you won't have a duplicated value :)
Solution 4
From RailsGuides. validates
works too:
class QuestionVote < ActiveRecord::Base
validates :user_id, :uniqueness => { :scope => :question_id }
end
Solution 5
Except for writing your own validate method, the best you could do with validates_uniqueness_of
is this:
validates_uniqueness_of :user_id, :scope => "question_id"
This will check that the user_id is unique within all rows with the same question_id as the record you are attempting to insert.
But that's not what you want.
I believe you're looking for the combination of :user_id
and :question_id
to be unique across the database.
In that case you need to do two things:
- Write your own validate method.
- Create a constraint in the database because there's still a chance that your app will process two records at the same time.
dfrankow
Updated on July 09, 2022Comments
-
dfrankow almost 2 years
Suppose the following DB migration in Ruby:
create_table :question_votes do |t| t.integer :user_id t.integer :question_id t.integer :vote t.timestamps end
Suppose further that I wish the rows in the DB contain unique (user_id, question_id) pairs. What is the right dust to put in the model to accomplish that?
validates_uniqueness_of :user_id, :question_id
seems to simply make rows unique by user id, and unique by question id, instead of unique by the pair. -
dfrankow about 15 yearsWhat if I do <pre> validate_uniqueness_of :user_id, :scope => :question_id validate_uniqueness_of :question_id, :scope => :user_id </pre> Is that enough?
-
shingara almost 14 yearsYes, but the exception don't help when you want just an error message.
-
Leopd about 11 yearsI'm not seeing the difference between
validates_uniqueness_of
usingscope
and the combination being unique. Can you provide an example of how they would differ? -
ahnbizcad almost 10 yearsshould the value be in square brackets, not curly braces?
-
D-side over 9 years@gwho Square brackets denote an array, a sequence of values. Curly braces denote a hash, a set of key-value pairs. We're not specifying keys here, only values. I understand it's kinda late and you probably know it already, but it might help out beginners coming here :)
-
ahnbizcad over 9 yearsOh it's not a scope lambda.
-
februaryInk almost 9 yearsIf you prefer the
validates
syntax:validates :user_id, uniqueness: { scope: [:question_id] }
-
Eugene over 8 yearsThis should be the best answer, validates alone is not enough! See this article for the details why: robots.thoughtbot.com/the-perils-of-uniqueness-validations
-
aks over 7 yearsWill this validation only fail when
user_id and question_id
both are same? -
xaunlopez over 5 yearsBest response, thanks for including everything needed!