How to call Base Class's __init__ method from the child class?

Question

If I have a python class as:

class BaseClass(object):
#code and the init function of the base class

And then I define a child class such as:

class ChildClass(BaseClass):
#here I want to call the init function of the base class

If the init function of the base class takes some arguments that I am taking them as arguments of the child class's init function, how do I pass these arguments to the base class?

The code that I have written is:

class Car(object):
    condition = "new"

    def __init__(self, model, color, mpg):
        self.model = model
        self.color = color
        self.mpg   = mpg

class ElectricCar(Car):
    def __init__(self, battery_type, model, color, mpg):
        self.battery_type=battery_type
        super(ElectricCar, self).__init__(model, color, mpg)

Where am I going wrong?

Solution 1

You could use super(ChildClass, self).__init__()

class BaseClass(object):
    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        pass

class ChildClass(BaseClass):
    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(ChildClass, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)

Your indentation is incorrect, here's the modified code:

class Car(object):
    condition = "new"

    def __init__(self, model, color, mpg):
        self.model = model
        self.color = color
        self.mpg   = mpg

class ElectricCar(Car):
    def __init__(self, battery_type, model, color, mpg):
        self.battery_type=battery_type
        super(ElectricCar, self).__init__(model, color, mpg)

car = ElectricCar('battery', 'ford', 'golden', 10)
print car.__dict__

Here's the output:

{'color': 'golden', 'mpg': 10, 'model': 'ford', 'battery_type': 'battery'}

Solution 2

As Mingyu pointed out, there is a problem in formatting. Other than that, I would strongly recommend not using the Derived class's name while calling super() since it makes your code inflexible (code maintenance and inheritance issues). In Python 3, Use super().__init__ instead. Here is the code after incorporating these changes :

class Car(object):
    condition = "new"

    def __init__(self, model, color, mpg):
        self.model = model
        self.color = color
        self.mpg   = mpg

class ElectricCar(Car):

    def __init__(self, battery_type, model, color, mpg):
        self.battery_type=battery_type
        super().__init__(model, color, mpg)

Thanks to Erwin Mayer for pointing out the issue in using __class__ with super()

Solution 3

If you are using Python 3, it is recommended to simply call super() without any argument:

class Car(object):
    condition = "new"

    def __init__(self, model, color, mpg):
        self.model = model
        self.color = color
        self.mpg   = mpg

class ElectricCar(Car):
    def __init__(self, battery_type, model, color, mpg):
        self.battery_type=battery_type
        super().__init__(model, color, mpg)

car = ElectricCar('battery', 'ford', 'golden', 10)
print car.__dict__

Do not call super with class as it may lead to infinite recursion exceptions as per this answer.

Solution 4

You can call the super class's constructor like this

class A(object):
    def __init__(self, number):
        print "parent", number

class B(A):
    def __init__(self):
        super(B, self).__init__(5)

b = B()

NOTE:

This will work only when the parent class inherits object

View more solutions

Comments

[abarnert]

If you pass BaseClass to super, it'll skip over BaseClass and call object.__init__, which is almost certainly not what you want.

[abarnert]

Meanwhile, the only thing wrong with the OP's code is his indentation, explaining super (even if you explained it correctly, which you didn't) doesn't help, especially given that he already used it exactly the same way; in fact, it's character-for-character identical.

[Mingyu]

Thanks, @abarnert. Initially, he did not post his code and the question he asked is the one in the title.

[jwg]

Can you give any explanation for the recommendation 'not to use the Derived class's name'?

[Craig Finch]

@jwg I updated the answer to explain why class is a better choice.

[Erwin Mayer]

@CraigFinch it doesn't seem to be a good idea at all to use self.__class__. In Python 3 you can simply use super().__init__

[Marc]

Yet another reason Py3 is superior to Py2. (As someone who came to python after 3.4 came out)

[mojoken]

Just curious why all the answers in this question are setting self.battery_type before calling the super init method. Isn't it considered better practice to call super init before modifying anything in the object, so the base class is fully initialized first? Or am I missing something here?

[Charlie Parker]

Your answer is the most highly voted. You should really reference how to not use the derived class name by doing super().__init__(args)

[Charlie Parker]

don't use derived class name do this in python 3 (pseudocode): super().__init__(args...)

[Astrid]

@CharlieParker can you please expand? What should we not do?

[MEMark]

@mojoken Most likely because it was that way in the OP's question. I would agree that the reverse is usually better.