How to kill a process by port on MacOS, a la fuser -k 9000/tcp
Solution 1
lsof -P | grep ':PortNumber' | awk '{print $2}' | xargs kill -9
Change PortNumber
to the actual port you want to search for.
Solution 2
Adding the -t and -i flags to lsof
should speed it up even more by removing the need for grep and awk.
lsof -nti:NumberOfPort | xargs kill -9
lsof
arguments:
-n
Avoids host names lookup (may result in faster performance)-t
Terse output; returns process IDs only to facilitate piping the output to kill-i
Selects only those files whose Internet address matches
kill
arguments:
-9
Non-catchable, non-ignorable kill
Solution 3
You can see if a port if open by this command
sudo lsof -i :8000
where 8000 is the port number
If the port is open, it should return a string containing the Process ID (PID).
Copy this PID and
kill -9 PID
If you need to see all the open ports, you can perform a Port Scan in the Network Utility application.
Solution 4
Add -n to lsof and you remove the reverse DNS lookup from the command and reduce the run time from minutes to seconds.
lsof -Pn | grep ':NumberOfPort' | awk '{print $2}' | xargs kill -9
Solution 5
- Check your port is open or not by
sudo lsof -i : {PORT_NUMBER}
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
java 582 Thirumal 300u IPv6 0xf91b63da8f10f8b7 0t0 TCP *:distinct (LISTEN)
2. Close the port by killing process PID
sudo kill -9 582
Kris
Cynefin, Complexity, Agile, Business, Architecture, Teams
Updated on September 18, 2022Comments
-
Kris over 1 year
On linux I can kill a process knowing only the port it is listening on using
fuser -k 9000/tcp
, how do I so the same on MacOS? -
Kris almost 12 yearsI just had to add
-9
to the end to get this to work, but I believe that is due to the nature of the listening application and not generally recommended practice, tokill -9
that is. -
aces. over 11 years@Kris - lsof -P | grep ':NumberOfPort' | awk '{print $2}' | xargs kill -9 worked!
-
yass almost 7 yearsYou are repeating other answer
-
Ben Sh almost 7 yearsWorks and is more concise than the accepted answer!
-
daleyjem over 4 yearsWAY faster with this approach