How to mock ModelState.IsValid using the Moq framework?
Solution 1
You don't need to mock it. If you already have a controller you can add a model state error when initializing your test:
// arrange
_controllerUnderTest.ModelState.AddModelError("key", "error message");
// act
// Now call the controller action and it will
// enter the (!ModelState.IsValid) condition
var actual = _controllerUnderTest.Index();
Solution 2
The only issue I have with the solution above is that it doesn't actually test the model if I set attributes. I setup my controller this way.
private HomeController GenerateController(object model)
{
HomeController controller = new HomeController()
{
RoleService = new MockRoleService(),
MembershipService = new MockMembershipService()
};
MvcMockHelpers.SetFakeAuthenticatedControllerContext(controller);
// bind errors modelstate to the controller
var modelBinder = new ModelBindingContext()
{
ModelMetadata = ModelMetadataProviders.Current.GetMetadataForType(() => model, model.GetType()),
ValueProvider = new NameValueCollectionValueProvider(new NameValueCollection(), CultureInfo.InvariantCulture)
};
var binder = new DefaultModelBinder().BindModel(new ControllerContext(), modelBinder);
controller.ModelState.Clear();
controller.ModelState.Merge(modelBinder.ModelState);
return controller;
}
The modelBinder object is the object that test the validity of the model. This way I can just set the values of the object and test it.
Solution 3
uadrive's answer took me part of the way, but there were still some gaps. Without any data in the input to new NameValueCollectionValueProvider()
, the model binder will bind the controller to an empty model, not to the model
object.
That's fine -- just serialise your model as a NameValueCollection
, and then pass that into the NameValueCollectionValueProvider
constructor. Well, not quite. Unfortunately, it didn't work in my case because my model contains a collection, and the NameValueCollectionValueProvider
does not play nicely with collections.
The JsonValueProviderFactory
comes to the rescue here, though. It can be used by the DefaultModelBinder
as long as you specify a content type of "application/json
" and pass your serialised JSON object into your request's input stream (Please note, because this input stream is a memory stream, it's OK to leave it undisposed, as a memory stream doesn't hold on to any external resources):
protected void BindModel<TModel>(Controller controller, TModel viewModel)
{
var controllerContext = SetUpControllerContext(controller, viewModel);
var bindingContext = new ModelBindingContext
{
ModelMetadata = ModelMetadataProviders.Current.GetMetadataForType(() => viewModel, typeof(TModel)),
ValueProvider = new JsonValueProviderFactory().GetValueProvider(controllerContext)
};
new DefaultModelBinder().BindModel(controller.ControllerContext, bindingContext);
controller.ModelState.Clear();
controller.ModelState.Merge(bindingContext.ModelState);
}
private static ControllerContext SetUpControllerContext<TModel>(Controller controller, TModel viewModel)
{
var controllerContext = A.Fake<ControllerContext>();
controller.ControllerContext = controllerContext;
var json = new JavaScriptSerializer().Serialize(viewModel);
A.CallTo(() => controllerContext.Controller).Returns(controller);
A.CallTo(() => controllerContext.HttpContext.Request.InputStream).Returns(new MemoryStream(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(json)));
A.CallTo(() => controllerContext.HttpContext.Request.ContentType).Returns("application/json");
return controllerContext;
}
Mazen
Updated on June 09, 2020Comments
-
Mazen about 4 years
I'm checking
ModelState.IsValid
in my controller action method that creates an Employee like this:[HttpPost] public virtual ActionResult Create(EmployeeForm employeeForm) { if (this.ModelState.IsValid) { IEmployee employee = this._uiFactoryInstance.Map(employeeForm); employee.Save(); } // Etc. }
I want to mock it in my unit test method using Moq Framework. I tried to mock it like this:
var modelState = new Mock<ModelStateDictionary>(); modelState.Setup(m => m.IsValid).Returns(true);
But this throws an exception in my unit test case. Can anyone help me out here?
-
W.Jackson almost 12 yearsVery nice, this is exactly what I was looking for. I don't know how many people post to an old question like this but it had value you for me. Thanks.
-
Karan almost 12 yearshow do we set the ModelState.IsValid to hit the true case? ModelState does not have a setter, and hence we cannot do the following: _controllerUnderTest.ModelState.IsValid = true. Without that, it will not hit the employee
-
Darin Dimitrov almost 12 years@Newton, it's true by default. You don't need to specify anything to hit the true case. If you want to hit the false case you simply add a modelstate error as shown in my answer.
-
Vladimir Shmidt almost 12 yearsIMHO Better solution is to use mvc conveyor. In this way you get more realistic behavior of your controller, you should deliver model validation to it's destiny - attribute validations. Below post is describing this (stackoverflow.com/a/5580363/572612)
-
RubberDuck over 7 yearsIsn't it better to test the model in isolation with something like this? stackoverflow.com/a/4331964/3198973
-
xDaevax over 6 yearsWhile this is a clever solution, I agree with @RubberDuck. For this to be an actual, isolated unit-test, the validation of the model should be its own test, while the testing of the controller should have its own tests. If the model changes to violate the ModelBinder validation, your controller test will fail, which is a false positive since the controller logic isn't broken. To test an invalid ModelStateDictionary, simply add a fake ModelState error for the ModelState.IsValid check to fail.