How to mock psycopg2 cursor object?

22,821

Solution 1

Since the cursor is the return value of con.cursor, you only need to mock the connection, then configure it properly. For example,

query_result = [("field1a", "field2a"), ("field1b", "field2b")]
with mock.patch('psycopg2.connect') as mock_connect:
    mock_connect.cursor.return_value.fetchall.return_value = query_result
    super_cool_method()

Solution 2

You have a series of chained calls, each returning a new object. If you mock just the psycopg2.connect() call, you can follow that chain of calls (each producing mock objects) via .return_value attributes, which reference the returned mock for such calls:

@mock.patch("psycopg2.connect")
def test_super_awesome_stuff(self, mock_connect):
    expected = [['fake', 'row', 1], ['fake', 'row', 2]]

    mock_con = mock_connect.return_value  # result of psycopg2.connect(**connection_stuff)
    mock_cur = mock_con.cursor.return_value  # result of con.cursor(cursor_factory=DictCursor)
    mock_cur.fetchall.return_value = expected  # return this when calling cur.fetchall()

    result = super_cool_method()
    self.assertEqual(result, expected)

Because you hold onto references for the mock connect function, as well as the mock connection and cursor objects you can then also assert if they were called correctly:

mock_connect.assert_called_with(**connection_stuff)
mock_con.cursor.asset_called_with(cursor_factory=DictCursor)
mock_cur.execute.assert_called_with("Super duper SQL query")

If you don't need to test these, you could just chain up the return_value references to go straight to the result of cursor() call on the connection object:

@mock.patch("psycopg2.connect")
def test_super_awesome_stuff(self, mock_connect):
    expected = [['fake', 'row', 1], ['fake', 'row' 2]]
    mock_connect.return_value.cursor.return_value.fetchall.return_value = expected

    result = super_cool_method()
    self.assertEqual(result, expected)

Note that if you are using the connection as a context manager to automatically commit the transaction and you use as to bind the object returned by __enter__() to a new name (so with psycopg2.connect(...) as conn: # ...) then you'll need to inject an additional __enter__.return_value in the call chain:

mock_con_cm = mock_connect.return_value  # result of psycopg2.connect(**connection_stuff)
mock_con = mock_con_cm.__enter__.return_value  # object assigned to con in with ... as con    
mock_cur = mock_con.cursor.return_value  # result of con.cursor(cursor_factory=DictCursor)
mock_cur.fetchall.return_value = expected  # return this when calling cur.fetchall()

The same applies to the result of with conn.cursor() as cursor:, the conn.cursor.return_value.__enter__.return_value object is assigned to the as target.

Solution 3

The following answer is the variation of above answers. I was using django.db.connections cursor object.

So following code worked for me

@patch('django.db.connections')
def test_supercool_method(self, mock_connections):
    query_result = [("field1a", "field2a"), ("field1b", "field2b")]
    mock_connections.__getitem__.return_value.cursor.return_value.__enter__.return_value.fetchall.return_value = query_result

    result = supercool_method()
    self.assertIsInstance(result, list)
Share:
22,821

Related videos on Youtube

zyshara
Author by

zyshara

Updated on July 11, 2022

Comments

  • zyshara
    zyshara almost 2 years

    I have this code segment in Python2:

    def super_cool_method():
        con = psycopg2.connect(**connection_stuff)
        cur = con.cursor(cursor_factory=DictCursor)
        cur.execute("Super duper SQL query")
        rows = cur.fetchall()
    
        for row in rows:
            # do some data manipulation on row
        return rows
    

    that I'd like to write some unittests for. I'm wondering how to use mock.patch in order to patch out the cursor and connection variables so that they return a fake set of data? I've tried the following segment of code for my unittests but to no avail:

    @mock.patch("psycopg2.connect")
    @mock.patch("psycopg2.extensions.cursor.fetchall")
    def test_super_awesome_stuff(self, a, b):
        testing = super_cool_method()
    

    But I seem to get the following error:

    TypeError: can't set attributes of built-in/extension type 'psycopg2.extensions.cursor'
    
  • allenlin1992
    allenlin1992 almost 8 years
    This doesn't work for me. The result I get from fetchall is '<MagicMock name='connect().cursor().fetchall()' id='40430416'>'
  • chepner
    chepner almost 8 years
    @AllenLin That's because I didn't configure a return value for fetchall, just execute.
  • allenlin1992
    allenlin1992 almost 8 years
    cursor.execute usually returns None. Why would you configure a return value for execute but not fetchall?
  • chepner
    chepner almost 8 years
    Because clearly I should have mocked fetchall :) Sorry about the confusion.
  • allenlin1992
    allenlin1992 almost 8 years
    Unfortunately still not working for me. I've posted my problem as it's own question: stackoverflow.com/questions/37164891/…
  • Martijn Pieters
    Martijn Pieters almost 8 years
    @chepner: actually, because both connect and execute are called, you need to inject a few more return_value references here. Not that the return value of execute is used though, fetchall is never referenced on that mock.
  • Davos
    Davos over 5 years
    This is awesome, thanks for the context manager __enter__ advice. From a philosophy perspective, is this a suggested way of testing? it seems like it is just comparing expected to expected as returned from the mock, so this test would always work even if the logic in super_cool_method() changed - as long as the syntax is valid the test would never break. Is this a simple example to illustrate the point, or is it doing something I've missed? I can see that you can enforce DictCursor which is valuable, but can't see why fetchall.return_value is being tested, trying to learn.
  • Martijn Pieters
    Martijn Pieters over 5 years
    @Davos yes, this is a good philosophy because your unit test should not be testing if psycopg2 is working correctly, it should be testing if your code is using the results correctly. Real-world code under test will do something with the result from fetchall() and it is that something that matters. Or you want to test what was passed to cursor.execute(), etc.
  • Andrey Semakin
    Andrey Semakin about 5 years
    Correct line is mock_connect.return_value.cursor.return_value.execute.return‌​_value.fetch_all.ret‌​urn_value = query_result
  • DarioB
    DarioB almost 5 years
    For future reference, this doesn't work because he mistyped fetch_all, when he should have write fetchall. Changing to that it woks.
  • BHC
    BHC almost 5 years
    Correct line is actually mock_connect.return_value.cursor.return_value.fetch_all.retu‌​rn_value = query_result - fetchall is not a member of execute
  • chepner
    chepner almost 5 years
    I think it's fixed now. fetchall is, indeed, not a method of the return value of execute; rather execute prepares a cursor for using fetchall.
  • Martijn Pieters
    Martijn Pieters almost 2 years
    @RichardA: Thanks for the edit! I thought that perhaps back in 2016 and Python 2.7, the (separately installed) mock project had called_with as an alias for assert_called_with, but alas, it was simply me getting it wrong.
  • Richard A
    Richard A almost 2 years
    @MartijnPieters: and thank you for your answer from way back then. You saved me a lot of time and fumbling around.