How to pull into not-the-current-branch?

11,317

Solution 1

You are correct that pull/merge only merges into the current branch.

You can, however, still use fetch. For instance (names below changed to protect the innocent but the hashes are real):

$ git branch | grep '^*'
* SOMEBRANCH
$ git rev-parse OTHER_BRANCH origin/OTHER_BRANCH
7b9b8e57cf19964b60ebda0f03a1d5da3de9e2fe
7b9b8e57cf19964b60ebda0f03a1d5da3de9e2fe
$ git fetch
7b9b8e5..1efca56  OTHER_BRANCH -> origin/OTHER_BRANCH
$ git rev-parse OTHER_BRANCH origin/OTHER_BRANCH
7b9b8e57cf19964b60ebda0f03a1d5da3de9e2fe
1efca56c08b7a0f511a3951195656a798c56aa62

In this case, fetch updated a bunch of origin/ branches. None of the local branches were updated (git rev-parse output for those remains the same) but the new commits are now in the repo and can be viewed (git log origin/OTHER_BRANCH, gitk --all, etc).

Depending on your needs, this might be sufficient. In particular you can see what needs to be applied from origin/master onto master, all without leaving your current branch.

Solution 2

git fetch -u origin master:master

Merge, update, and pull Git branches without using checkouts

git fetch -u <remote> <remoteBranch>:<localBranch>

The -u or --update-head-ok ensures that the command still works even if you have the given branch checked out, which otherwise gives the error:

fatal: Refusing to fetch into current branch refs/heads/master of non-bare repository

Solution 3

I've begun using github's hub sync helper to automate this process, rather than relying on fetching individual branches that change between the various repos you're working on:

hub is an extension to command-line git that helps you do everyday GitHub tasks without ever leaving the terminal. https://hub.github.com/

$ hub sync
  • If the local branch is outdated, fast-forward it;
  • If the local branch contains unpushed work, warn about it;
  • If the branch seems merged and its upstream branch was deleted, delete it.

Running hub sync safely updates all of your local branches to the version on the remote.

Share:
11,317
Steve Bennett
Author by

Steve Bennett

Freelance Mapbox GL JS, vector tile and VueJS guru, available for consulting work. See http://hire.stevebennett.me. I specialise in high performance web map data visualisations, and custom vector tile generation for the Mapbox platform. I use NodeJS for back-end data processing, and VueJS for front end. My blog: http://stevebennett.me My NPM profile: https://www.npmjs.com/~stevage (Please don't email me asking for help with a StackOverflow question.)

Updated on June 22, 2022

Comments

  • Steve Bennett
    Steve Bennett almost 2 years

    Say my current branch is myfeature. I want to get master up to date. Both git merge git pull always merge into the current branch, as far as I can tell.

    Is there a way to merge changes from a remote branch (eg, origin/master) into a branch I'm not currently on (master)? I can think of one way:

    git stash
    git checkout master
    git pull origin/master
    git checkout myfeature
    git stash apply
    

    Is there a better one?

    (It's possibly my whole question is wrong: would git fetch automatically update master to match origin/master, if remote-tracking is enabled?)