Html.CheckBox returns false if disabled, even if seleced

21,721

Solution 1

An input field marked with the disabled="disabled" attribute NEVER sends its value to the server. If you want to achieve this you could use the readonly="readonly" attribute which still prevents the user from modifying the value but sends the existing value when the form is submitted.

Solution 2

I don't know if it solves your problem but this was the solution for me:

My model has an UserMigrated boolean property, once the user has setted to migrated, he can't go back, so the view becomes:

@if (Model.UserMigrated)
    {
    <td>@Html.CheckBox("chkBoxReadOnly", true, new {disabled = "disabled"})</td>
        @Html.HiddenFor(m => m.UserMigrated)
    }
else
    {
    <td>@Html.CheckBoxFor(m => m.UserMigrated)</td>
    }

Solution 3

1) From my point of view there is no way to change the behavior of the Html.CheckBox method. I had to face the problem time ago and i ended up with manually constructing the input checkbox as you suggest. To construct the input checkbox is not always the hell as using the helper methods is not always the eaven. Of course biulding your own helper method can be the right choise.

2) Disabled input field is not posted when form is submitted; i would expect the same, submiting disabled input checkbox fileds, whether are checked or not.

We can argue about the choice adoped to relay on input hidden field for pushing into the request the checkbox, when the checkbox is not selected. The side effect of this choice is that we will find the checkbox name among the the posted data even if the checkbox is disable in disagreement with what stated above that is: disabled input field is not posted when form is submitted

Solution 4

Adding the Hidden field before check box worked for me. Note that i am adding the hidden field only if the field is disabled.

Credit goes to this post

  @{
     if (Model.MyFieldDisabled)
      {
         @Html.HiddenFor(x => x.MyField)
      }
   }    

    @Html.CheckBoxFor(x => x.MyField,  new {disabled = "disabled"})
Share:
21,721
elwyn
Author by

elwyn

Updated on July 20, 2021

Comments

  • elwyn
    elwyn almost 3 years

    Hopefully an easy question for you asp.net mvc gurus:

    I have a checkbox, created like this:

    <%=Html.CheckBox("MyCheckBox", true, new { disabled = "disabled"})%>
    

    In my action I am checking the value like so:

    bool isChecked = form["MyCheckBox"].Contains("true");
    

    I expect this to return true, as it is checked. However the hidden element that gets created has a false value:

    <input checked="checked" disabled="disabled" id="MyCheckBox" name="MyCheckBox" type="checkbox" value="true" />
    <input name="MyCheckBox" type="hidden" value="false" />
    

    First, is there a way to make the HtmlHelper behave as I expect it should? Or is manually constructing the input/creating my own helper method the only way? (not that this is a big deal...)

    Second, can anyone shed some light on why the checkboxes behave this way? Am I incorrect in assuming a disabled checkbox that is ticked should == true? Does a disabled state semantically mean false?

  • VoodooChild
    VoodooChild over 13 years
    +1: I found this out the hard way not that long ago as I am also a beginner in MVC. However, do you have a good suggestion if it is an input field and I want to make it disabled/readonly? Currently setting "readonly" does NOT grey the input field like it does for the "disabled".
  • Darin Dimitrov
    Darin Dimitrov over 13 years
    @VoodooChild, yeah that happens with FireFox and checkboxes. Common workarounds involve disabled with a backing hidden field.
  • elwyn
    elwyn over 13 years
    Thanks, I did not know that. I went with a custom HtmlHelper that uses the 'disabled' attribute and renders a hidden field.
  • VoodooChild
    VoodooChild over 13 years
    @elwyn: could you please post sample of your work around when you get a chance? I would like to keep it for a reference on this question. Thanks!
  • elwyn
    elwyn over 13 years
    Sorry the extension method I made is written for a very specific situation (it isn't just a CheckBox helper), the problem I gave in the OP is a simplified case. What I wrote wouldn't be much use to anyone else...
  • gmail user
    gmail user over 11 years
    I've tried 'readonly' with checbox. There is no effect if I make it read only.
  • Darin Dimitrov
    Darin Dimitrov over 11 years
    @gmailuser, then probably you have some other problem.
  • JustAMartin
    JustAMartin almost 8 years
    @DarinDimitrov readonly attribute does not work on checkboxes in general.
  • jimjim
    jimjim over 5 years
    Yes, not sure what is a point of disabled controlled, it should have been label, or just not be shown. there is not point in displaying a control where it is not being used, or can not be used for anything except to display information.
  • Kellen Stuart
    Kellen Stuart about 5 years
    @gmailuser I ended up getting around that by using IValidatable to perform validation if the user didn't select the options I wanted them to
  • camainc
    camainc about 3 years
    LOL, this is the best solution.