Include JavaScript file in partial views

javascript jquery asp.net-mvc partial-views

46,112

Solution 1

Seems very similar to this question: Linking JavaScript Libraries in User Controls

I'll repost my answer that that question here.

I would definitely advise against putting them inside partials for exactly the reason you mention. There is a high chance that one view could pull in two partials that both have references to the same js file. You've also got the performance hit of loading js before loading the rest of the html.

I don't know about best practice but I choose to include any common js files inside the masterpage and then define a separate ContentPlaceHolder for some additional js files that are specific to a particular or small number of views.

Here's an example master page - it's pretty self explanatory.

<%@ Master Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewMasterPage" %>
<head runat="server">
    ... BLAH ...
    <asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="AdditionalHead" runat="server" />
    ... BLAH ...
    <%= Html.CSSBlock("/styles/site.css") %>
    <%= Html.CSSBlock("/styles/ie6.css", 6) %>
    <%= Html.CSSBlock("/styles/ie7.css", 7) %>
    <asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="AdditionalCSS" runat="server" />
</head>
<body>
    ... BLAH ...
    <%= Html.JSBlock("/scripts/jquery-1.3.2.js", "/scripts/jquery-1.3.2.min.js") %>
    <%= Html.JSBlock("/scripts/global.js", "/scripts/global.min.js") %>
    <asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="AdditionalJS" runat="server" />
</body>

Html.CSSBlock & Html.JSBlock are obviously my own extensions but again, they are self explanatory in what they do.

Then in say a SignUp.aspx view I would have

<asp:Content ID="signUpContent" ContentPlaceHolderID="AdditionalJS" runat="server">
    <%= Html.JSBlock("/scripts/pages/account.signup.js", "/scripts/pages/account.signup.min.js") %>
</asp:Content>

HTHs, Charles

Ps. Here is a follow up question I asked about minifying and concatenating js files: Concatenate & Minify JS on the fly OR at build time - ASP.NET MVC

EDIT: As requested on my other answer, my implementation of .JSBlock(a, b) as requested

public static MvcHtmlString JSBlock(this HtmlHelper html, string fileName)
{
    return html.JSBlock(fileName, string.Empty);
}

public static MvcHtmlString JSBlock(this HtmlHelper html, string fileName, string releaseFileName)
{
    if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(fileName))
        throw new ArgumentNullException("fileName");

    string jsTag = string.Format("<script type=\"text/javascript\" src=\"{0}\"></script>",
                                 html.MEDebugReleaseString(fileName, releaseFileName));

    return MvcHtmlString.Create(jsTag);
}

And then where the magic happens...

    public static MvcHtmlString MEDebugReleaseString(this HtmlHelper html, string debugString, string releaseString)
    {
        string toReturn = debugString;
#if DEBUG
#else
        if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(releaseString))
            toReturn = releaseString;
#endif
        return MvcHtmlString.Create(toReturn);
    }

Solution 2

The reason you would put a script at the bottom of the page is to ensure the dom has been loaded before attempting any manipulation. This can also be achieved in something like the $(document).ready(callback); jQuery method.

I share the view of not putting embedded JavaScript in the html. Instead I use an Html helper to create an empty div to use as a server instruction. The helper sig is Html.ServerData(String name, Object data);

I use this ServerData method for instructions from the server to the client. The div tag keeps it clean and the "data-" attribute is valid html5.

For the loadScript instruction I may do something like this in my ascx or aspx:

<%= Html.ServerData("loadScript", new { url: "pathTo.js" }) %>

Or add another helper to do this which looks a little cleaner:

<%= Html.LoadScript("~/path/to.js") %>

The html output would be:

<div name="loadScript" data-server="encoded json string">

Then I have a jQuery method that can find any server data tag: $(containingElement).serverData("loadScript"); // returns a jQuery like array of the decoded json objects.

The client may look something like this:

var script = $(containingelement").serverData("loadScript");
$.getScript(script.url, function () {
    // script has been loaded - can do stuff with it now
});

This technique is great for user controls or scripts that need to be loaded within ajax loaded content. The version I wrote is a little more involved handling caching scripts so they load only once per full page load and contain callbacks and jQuery triggers so you can hook into it when it is ready.

If anyone is interested in the full version of this (from MVC to jQuery extension) I would be happy to show off this technique in more detail. Otherwise - hopes it gives someone a new way of approaching this tricky problem.

Solution 3

Today I've created my own solution which fits the bill perfectly. Whether it is good design or not, is for you all to decide but thought I should share either way!

Below is my HtmlExtensions class which allows you to do this in your masterpage:

<%=Html.RenderJScripts() %>

My HtmlExtensions class:

public static class HtmlExtensions
{
    private const string JSCRIPT_VIEWDATA = "__js";

    #region Javascript Inclusions

    public static void JScript(this HtmlHelper html, string scriptLocation)
    {
        html.JScript(scriptLocation, string.Empty);
    }

    public static void JScript(this HtmlHelper html, string scriptLocationDebug, string scriptLocationRelease)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(scriptLocationDebug))
            throw new ArgumentNullException("fileName");

        string jsTag = "<script type=\"text/javascript\" src=\"{0}\"></script>";

#if DEBUG
        jsTag = string.Format(jsTag, scriptLocationDebug);
#else
        jsTag = string.Format(jsTag, !string.IsNullOrEmpty(scriptLocationRelease) ? scriptLocationRelease : scriptLocationDebug);
#endif

        registerJScript(html, jsTag);
    }

    public static MvcHtmlString RenderJScripts(this HtmlHelper html)
    {
        List<string> jscripts = html.ViewContext.TempData[JSCRIPT_VIEWDATA] as List<string>;
        string result = string.Empty; ;
        if(jscripts != null)
        {
            result = string.Join("\r\n", jscripts);
        }
        return MvcHtmlString.Create(result);
    }

    private static void registerJScript(HtmlHelper html, string jsTag)
    {
        List<string> jscripts = html.ViewContext.TempData[JSCRIPT_VIEWDATA] as List<string>;
        if(jscripts == null) jscripts = new List<string>();

        if(!jscripts.Contains(jsTag))
            jscripts.Add(jsTag);

        html.ViewContext.TempData[JSCRIPT_VIEWDATA] = jscripts;
    }

    #endregion

}

What is going on?
The class above will extend the HtmlHelper with methods to add javascript links to a collection that is being stored by the HtmlHelper.ViewContext.TempData collection. At the end of the masterpage I put the <%=Html.RenderJScripts() %> which will loop the jscripts collection inside the HtmlHelper.ViewContext.TempData and render these to the output.

There is a downside however,.. You have to ensure that you don't render the scripts before you've added them. If you'd want to do this for css links for example, it wouldn't work because you have to place these in the <head> tag of your page and the htmlhelper would render the output before you've even added a link.

46,112

Author by

Peter

Twitter: twitter.com/de_peter I'm a freelance .NET consultant.

Updated on July 05, 2022

Comments

Peter almost 2 years

I am wondering what the best practice is for including javascript files inside partial views. Once rendered this will end up as a js include tag in the middle of my page's html. From my point of view this isn't a nice way of doing this. They belong in the head tag and as such should not prevent the browser from rendering the html in one go.

An example: I am using a jquery picturegallery plugin inside a 'PictureGallery' partial view as this partial view will be used on several pages. This plugin only needs to be loaded when this view is used and I don't want to have to need to know which plugins each partial view is using...

Thanks for your answers.