Installation issues for Virtualenv and VirtualenvWrapper in 13.04

python virtualenv virtualenvwrapper flask bottle

1,086

Your trying to install a virtualenv on a mountpoint that does not support symbolic links . If you look at the output of mount you will see has some mountpoint at /home/yourusername/dropbox. Try a different location, such as your home directory:

cd 
virtualenv --python=python2.7 flaskenv

(note: currently flask only works on python 2)

There is no point syncing the vritualenv on dropbox anyway. It won't work on another system unless its identical. You can sync between virtualenvs using pip requirements.txt files .

1,086

marcosh

Updated on September 18, 2022

Comments

marcosh over 1 year
I have two html tables, one above the other, both with width 100%, something like
```
<div>
    <table>table content...</table>
    <table>table content...</table>
<div>
```
When the page is large enough the two table have the same width. But when I restrict the page, at a certain point, one of the two tables stops shrinking and the other continues, causing the fact that the two tables don't have the same width anymore.

You can see it in action here.

Is there a way with pure css to tell the two tables to maintain the same width? What would be nice is that when the first table stops to shrink, the second stops as well.
Vivek Sharma almost 11 years

thanks guysoft. I will try this out. And extra thanks for sync tip.
GuySoft almost 11 years

Ok, seems like you can only run flask on python 2. According to this issue opened in their github. You must use virtualenv --python=python2.7 flaskenv. Updated the answer to include this.
Vivek Sharma almost 11 years

Thank you very much GuySoft. I was able to install Flask.
Vivek Sharma almost 11 years

GuySoft, can you please help here. stackoverflow.com/questions/16811586/…
GuySoft almost 11 years

Vivek Sharma, No Idea about that. Not that much experience with Flask yet.
marcosh about 9 years

thanks, but this causes the content of the cells to go out of the cell itself
marcosh about 9 years

but with the minimum-width solution, I don't know when the first table will stop shrinking
Abdul Ahmad about 9 years

well.. thats why you kind of test, i tried 400px, it was too small, so I went up to 500, and finally 550 was good. I'm not sure if you have many options here
GreyRoofPigeon about 9 years

Yes, at a certained point, the cells are to small to fit its contents... That's why they both have different widths in your original code. You could fix that by giving the table a minimum width with min-width: 600px. You'll need to try a which point it breaks, and set that as the min-width.
Abdul Ahmad about 9 years

your problem is that one table has 3 columns and the other has 2, thats why the top table stops shrinking first I think
marcosh almost 9 years

does exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!