Instantiate empty IQueryable for use with Linq to sql
Solution 1
Try this:
IQueryable<opportunity_vw> listOppLineData;
This is defining the variable, but you are waiting to initialise it.
Also, looking at your query, you could do it all in one, like so:
var listOppLineData = (from o in db.opportunity_vws
where o.fiscal_yr_and_qtr == qtr && (o.Group == whichGroup || whichGroup == "All")
select o
);
Solution 2
Try this. You can create a generic type with T or a specific type by replacing T with your type name.
IQueryable listOppLineData = Enumerable.Empty<T>().AsQueryable()
Solution 3
Your problem is that when you declare a variable in C#, you declare it only in the current scope. So, if you declare the variable listOppLineData
in the if
block, you can use it only inside that block, but not anywhere else. (You can define another variable with the same name in another block, but it would be a completely different variable, so it wouldn't have the value you assigned to the first variable.)
As you already figured out, you need to declare the variable outside the if
blocks.
Your first attempt didn't work, because the compiler saw that you didn't explicitly specify the type of the variable (that's what var
does) and you assigned a string
to the variable. So it inferred that the type of the variable is string
. And you can't assign something that is not a string
to such variable.
Your second attempt didn't work, because you can't create an instance of an interface. (If you want to create an instance, it has to be some specific type, usually a class.) And even if you fixed that, the non-generic IQueryable
doesn't know the type of items in it, so the foreach
wouldn't work well.
But you don't need to assign any value to the variable, since it's assigned in both branches of the if
. And the correct type here is the generic IQueryable<T>
, with T
being opportunity_vw
. That means the correct code is:
IQueryable<opportunity_vw> listOppLineData;
if (whichGroup == "All")
{
listOppLineData = …;
}
else
{
listOppLineData = …;
}
foreach (var data in listOppLineData)
{
…
}
If you really wanted to assign some value to the variable (although there is no reason to do that here), you could use null
(which represents no value):
IQueryable<opportunity_vw> listOppLineData = null;
Solution 4
For me answer was to set to empty from existing query and be able to call async without exception , if it was transformed to enumerable:
query1 = query1.Take(0);
It was used to union 2 queries from different tables in one common object and one of them could became empty in some validation cases. If I move first query from union to Enumerable I will get exception, if it will be called with async function(ToListAsync()), when called union:
var res = (await query1
.Select(q1=> new NewClass(q1))
.ToListAsync())
.Union(query2
.Select(q2=> new NewClass(q2)))
.ToList();
user2073077
Updated on February 04, 2022Comments
-
user2073077 over 2 years
I need to be able to either have an optional parameter in a Linq query, or be able to assign the query to a var in something like an IF if that optional parameter needs to be removed from the query.
If I set the query var inside the IF statement then it tells me that the var doesn't exist in context when I try to loop through it.
if (whichGroup == "All") { var listOppLineData = (from o in db.opportunity_vws where o.fiscal_yr_and_qtr == qtr select o ); } else { var listOppLineData = (from o in db.opportunity_vws where o.fiscal_yr_and_qtr == qtr && o.Group == whichGroup select o ); } foreach (var data in listOppLineData) //listOppLineData doesn't exist here {
I need to set the var before the IF statement I think, but I don't know what to set it to.
var listOppLineData = ""; // gives me Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Linq.IQueryable<Forecast.Models.opportunity_vw>' to 'string' IQueryable listOppLineData = new IQueryable(); //gives me Cannot create an instance of the abstract class or interface 'System.Linq.IQueryable'
-
svick about 11 yearsThat's nonsense. 1.
ToList()
won't fix anything here. 2. You certainly can iterateIQueryable<T>
without callingToList()
(because it inherits fromIEnumerable<T>
). -
Trey Gramann about 11 yearsGood catch. I think I misread this question several times now.
-
svick about 11 yearsBTW, the order of evaluation shouldn't matter here, since the code is actually not executed, it's converted to SQL.
-
Trey Gramann about 11 yearsPut it in LINQPad and see.
-
user2073077 about 11 yearsThat did the trick!! Thanks a bunch. I wasn't as clear as I should have been in the question either. By whichGroup == ALL I needed to query for whichGroup = anything, but I don't know how to do that in SQL.
-
svick about 11 years@user2073077 Simon's code does exactly that. Notice that if
whichGroup == "All"
, then the value ofo.Group
doesn't actually matter and that part of the condition will be alwaystrue
. (Though I have no idea if your SQL server is smart enough to realize that.) -
svick about 11 yearsYou mean I should create a database that first this model and then look at the generated SQL?
-
RoLYroLLs about 3 yearswhile the accepted answer helps the OP make his code "better", I truly needed to do instantiate an empty
IQueryable
and not have it set tonull
. This truly answers the OP's question of "I need to set the var before the IF statement I think, but I don't know what to set it to." -
Gert Arnold over 2 yearsPlease no, it's absolutely no improvement to use
object
here. Now how to uselistOppLineData
in the rest of the code? -
Mohsin Pinjari over 2 yearsyou can use it directly with the variable name 'listOppLineData '. I used this a lot in my web APIs projects and did not have issue yet .
-
darkenergy over 2 yearsWhy not use this: IQueryable<T> hierarchies = new List<T>().AsQueryable();
-
Admin over 2 yearsAs it’s currently written, your answer is unclear. Please edit to add additional details that will help others understand how this addresses the question asked. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
-
ChiefTwoPencils about 2 yearsI think the question is, how do you use it as anything other than a list of objects? That's less than helpful!