Is Google Test OK for testing C code?

52,426

Solution 1

It is pretty common to test C code using a C++ testing frameworks, even the leading book on the subject follows this approach. I have used googletest extensively in the past to unit test C code and can recommend it.

I have written a blog post about it that might be useful: http://meekrosoft.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/unit-testing-c-code-with-the-googletest-framework/

Solution 2

As all Google's C++ code, Google Test does not use exceptions, so exception safety flow won't be an issue. As long as your headers are C++-compatible (not using C++ keywords, export symbols with correct linkage), it should be fine.

Solution 3

Jason, be aware of that!!! :D

As Meekrosoft said, yes, it is possible. I also used his website when I tried to do that. It works, but there is one big problem:

GTest is objected oriented tool and C language isn't!

In example, in GTest you have a lot of functions (80% of whole API) that request object as parameter, for example:

EXPECT_CALL(turtle, PenDown())              // turtle is object(class) and PenDown() is method of that object
      .Times(AtLeast(1));

from GTest website gmock_for_dummies.md so you will use only macros like expect_equal, expect_bigger_than and so on...

I would like to suggest you tool CMocka (or some other C unit testing tools). It is also from google (modified by group of non-google developers) and it is created directly for C language. I use this one when I want to test C-type source code.

I hope this helps.. :-) Have a nice day.. :-)

Solution 4

I just thought I'd add another point: since gtest is C++, you'll be parsing your C headers under test as C++. This means the tests don't guarantee that the headers are consumable from C. I recently ran into this with a C library I'm building.

Solution 5

I could not name one. I guess there will be some things which you don't have in "normal" C. E.g I think the TestCase are derived from a certain class. But within the test you can test whatever you like and so why not C?

Share:
52,426

Related videos on Youtube

Jason
Author by

Jason

Updated on July 05, 2022

Comments

  • Jason
    Jason almost 2 years

    So I've come to like and enjoy using Google Test for a C++ project I'm involved in. I'm just bringing up a new project that will be straight C (a library) and so far can't see any reason why not to continuing using Google Test, even though its a C++ framework. Having a C++ compiler available will not be an issue.

    Are there are specific reasons why I shouldn't use Google Test for testing straight C code?

    Thanks.

    • Matt Joiner
      Matt Joiner almost 13 years
      I can understand why you'd want to do this, gtest is pretty parsimonious. Great question.
  • weberc2
    weberc2 about 9 years
    EXPECT_CALL is not defined in GoogleTest, but in GoogleMock (a mocking framework--not a unit testing framework). GoogleTest defines macros like EXPECT_EQ and EXPECT_TRUE, which are perfectly suited to unit testing procedural (non-OO) code. I'm currently using it for a project, and it works fine.
  • Jonah
    Jonah over 3 years
    Add to that list of incompatible things: any use of <stdatomic.h> in your C headers. gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60932
  • p4t
    p4t over 2 years
    <stdatomic.h> is now compatible with Google Test as of 2021-08-11 as mentioned by Jakub here: gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60932