is link / href with just parameters (starting with question mark) valid?

31,915

Solution 1

Yes, it is.
You can find it in RFC 1808 - Relative Uniform Resource Locators:

Within an object with a well-defined base URL of
Base: <URL:http://a/b/c/d;p?q#f>
the relative URLs would be resolved as follows:

5.1. Normal Examples

?y = <URL:http://a/b/c/d;p?y>

RFC 3986 - Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax restates the same, and adds more details, including the grammar:

relative-ref  = relative-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

relative-part = "//" authority path-abempty
             / path-absolute
             / path-noscheme
             / path-empty     #; zero characters

Now, that is not to say all browsers implement it according to the standard, but it looks like this should be safe.

Solution 2

Yes - and it will hit the current url with parameters what you are passing.

It is very convenient to use in situations where you want to make sure you do not cross current page/form boundary and keep on hitting same ActionMethod or whatever is listening with different parameters.

Share:
31,915
johndodo
Author by

johndodo

Updated on July 08, 2022

Comments

  • johndodo
    johndodo almost 2 years

    Is this link valid?

    <a href="?lang=en">eng</a>
    

    I know the browsers treat it as expected and I know the empty link would be ok too - but is it ok to specify just the parameters?

    I am curious because question mark ("?") is only a convention by most HTTP servers (AFAIK), though I admit it is a prevailing one.

    So, to recap:

    1. will all browsers interpret this correctly?

    2. is this in RFC?

    3. can I expect some trouble using this?

    UPDATE: the intended action on click is to redirect to the same page, but with different GET parameters ("lang=en" in above example).