Java loop efficiency ("for" vs. "foreach")
Solution 1
From section 14.14.2 of the JLS:
Otherwise, the Expression necessarily has an array type, T[]. Let L1 ... Lm be the (possibly empty) sequence of labels immediately preceding the enhanced for statement. Then the meaning of the enhanced for statement is given by the following basic for statement:
T[] a = Expression; L1: L2: ... Lm: for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) { VariableModifiersopt Type Identifier = a[i]; Statement }
In other words, I'd expect them to end up being compiled to the same code.
There's definitely a clear winner: the enhanced for loop is more readable. That should be your primary concern - you should only even consider micro-optimizing this sort of thing when you've proved that the most readable form doesn't perform as well as you want.
Solution 2
You can write your own simple test, which measure the execution time.
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
forLoop(text);
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
long result = end - start;
result is execution time.
Solution 3
Since you are using an array
type, the performance difference wouldn't matter. They would end up giving the same performance after going through the optimization
funnel.
But if you are using ADTs like List, then the forEachLoop
is obviously the best choice compared to multiple get(i)
calls.
Solution 4
You should choose the option which is more readable almost every time, unless you know you have a performance issue.
In this case, I would say they are guaranteed to be the same.
The only difference is you extra check for text.length
which is likely to be slower, rather than faster.
I would also ensure text is never null statically. e.g. using an @NotNull annotation. Its better to catch these issues at compile/build time (and it would be faster)
Solution 5
There is no performance penalty for using the for-each loop, even for arrays. In fact, it may offer a slight performance advantage over an ordinary for loop in some circumstances, as it computes the limit of the array index only once. For details follow this post.
PNS
Updated on June 06, 2020Comments
-
PNS about 4 years
(A question for those who know well the JVM compilation and optimization tricks... :-)
Is there any of the "for" and "foreach" patterns clearly superior to the other?
Consider the following two examples:
public void forLoop(String[] text) { if (text != null) { for (int i=0; i<text.length; i++) { // Do something with text[i] } } } public void foreachLoop(String[] text) { if (text != null) { for (String s : text) { // Do something with s, exactly as with text[i] } } }
Is
forLoop
faster or slower thanforeachLoop
?Assuming that in both cases the
text
array did not need any do sanity checks, is there a clear winner or still too close to make a call?EDIT: As noted in some of the answers, the performance should be identical for arrays, whereas the "foreach" pattern could be slightly better for Abstract Data Types like a List. See also this answer which discusses the subject.