JList.getModel() ClassCastException

15,991

Solution 1

You should not assume it is a DefaultListModel. Use the interface ListModel. The JList is returning an internal implementation of ListModel.

If you need access to the underlying model you should create it, set it in the JList constructor and retain it yourself.

Solution 2

I experienced this issue. I found this simple workaround:

//----instantiation----

    JList mList = new JList();
    mList.setModel(new DefaultListModel());

    /*---- do whatever you want---- */

    //Retain it wherever you want with
    DefaultListModel model = (DefaultListModel)mList.getModel();

Solution 3

If you are using NetBeans

  1. Select your jList
  2. In properties, click the model button
  3. select the "Custom code" option
  4. Write new DefaultListModel ()

jList custom code

Solution 4

Before JList<String>.getModel(), you must initialize your object JList<String>.setModel(new DefaultModelList())

Share:
15,991
Stripies
Author by

Stripies

Updated on July 27, 2022

Comments

  • Stripies
    Stripies almost 2 years

    When I call JList<String>.getModel() and cast it to DefaultListModel<String> it gives me this exception.

    Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.ClassCastException: javax.swing.JList$4 cannot be cast to javax.swing.DefaultListModel
    

    The code that throws it:

    private JList<String> list = new JList<String>();
    ((DefaultListModel<String>) list.getModel()).addElement(...);
    

    It doesn't do it every time though. Most of the time it works perfectly, but other times it throws this exception. I don't understand why this is happening. Is there anything I can do to stop this from happening?

  • jessechk
    jessechk about 11 years
    I had the same problem... Creating it with a new default list model fixes everything. +1
  • kleopatra
    kleopatra over 10 years
    nothing new compared to one of the earlier answers, is there ;-)
  • Willi Mentzel
    Willi Mentzel about 10 years
    retaining it is not necessary! see nikola despotoski's answer it is much more efficient!