Library missing for executable file
Solution 1
you@box:~$ locate libssl.so.1.0.0
On my machine, this returns /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0
and /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0
. So. This thing you're trying to run - is it 32-bit code, or 64-bit code? Assuming it's the former:
you@box:~/Desktop$ mkdir ~/MultiMC
you@box:~/Desktop$ mv MultiMC ~/MultiMC
you@box:~/Desktop$ cd ~/MultiMC
you@box:~/MultiMC$ ln -s /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0 ./
you@box:~/MultiMC$ ./MultiMC
And Bob should be your uncle. (The problem is that your "MultiMC" doesn't know where to look for the library, even though it's actually present on your system. In theory, if you have access to the source code - or if this is just a script to begin with - you could also just edit the application itself to look for the library in the right place.)
What if you DON'T have libssl.so.1.0.0
in the first place? Well, in this case you almost certainly do. But maybe there'll be ANOTHER library it needs and can't find after you satisfy this one, and you turn out not to already have that one...
you@box:~/MultiMC$ sudo apt-get install apt-file
you@box:~/MultiMC$ sudo apt-file update
you@box:~/MultiMC$ sudo apt-file search libssl.so.1.0.0
And you can then install whatever package contains the library you need. Always check first to see if you already have the library and just don't know where to find it, though! =)
Solution 2
Yeah, try running this in a terminal:
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0
If you are running multiarch, try this:
sudo apt-get install libssl1.0.0 libssl1.0.0:i386
See if it works :)
Related videos on Youtube
user1610406
Updated on September 18, 2022Comments
-
user1610406 over 1 year
There's an executable I downloaded onto my Ubuntu 10.04 and I can't run because it's missing a library. I have also tried compiling the source with CMake. This is my Terminal output:
zack@zack-laptop:~/Desktop$ ./MultiMC ./MultiMC: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I think I need libssl 1.0 to run this file, but I'm not sure. Any help?
@Jim Salter: The output of
lsb_release -d ; apt-file update ; apt-file search libssl.so.1.0.0
is:Description: Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS apt-file is now using the user's cache directory. If you want to switch back to the system-wide cache directory, run 'apt-file purge' Downloading complete file http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Contents-i386.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 16.8M 100 16.8M 0 0 275k 0 0:01:02 0:01:02 --:--:-- 171k Downloading complete file http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-updates/Contents-i386.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 15.4M 100 15.4M 0 0 228k 0 0:01:09 0:01:09 --:--:-- 346k Downloading Index http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Contents-i386.diff/Index: No Index available. Downloading complete file http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Contents-i386.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 File is up-to-date. Downloading Index http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-updates/Contents-i386.diff/Index: No Index available. Downloading complete file http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-updates/Contents-i386.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 0 15.4M 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:03 --:--:-- 0 File is up-to-date. Downloading Index http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Contents-i386.diff/Index: No Index available. Downloading complete file http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Contents-i386.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 File is up-to-date. Downloading Index http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-updates/Contents-i386.diff/Index: No Index available. Downloading complete file http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-updates/Contents-i386.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:01 --:--:-- 0 File is up-to-date. Ignoring source without Contents File: http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Contents-i386.gz Downloading complete file http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-security/Contents-i386.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 12.2M 100 12.2M 0 0 303k 0 0:00:41 0:00:41 --:--:-- 367k Downloading Index http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-security/Contents-i386.diff/Index: No Index available. Downloading complete file http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-security/Contents-i386.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 0 12.2M 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 File is up-to-date. Downloading Index http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-security/Contents-i386.diff/Index: No Index available. Downloading complete file http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-security/Contents-i386.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 0 12.2M 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 File is up-to-date. Ignoring source without Contents File: http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/Contents-i386.gz Ignoring source without Contents File: http://ppa.launchpad.net/nilarimogard/webupd8/ubuntu/dists/lucid/Contents-i386.gz
-
Kevin Bowen over 11 yearsYou might want to clarify your question by possibly explaining what the executable is and provide a link from where you downloaded it and the steps that you have already taken. If this is the MultiMC application, what version did you download? Did your MONO pre-reqs install ok?
-
user1610406 over 11 years@maggotbrain I already had MONO, I downloaded the latest version availible from here, and I have also tried compiling the source with CMake, which didn't work either.
-
-
user1610406 over 11 yearsNope, I already tried that.
-
user1610406 over 11 yearsI had no output of both
sudo apt-file search libssl.so.1.0.0
andlocate libssl.so.1.0.0
-
Jim Salter over 11 yearsThat's surprising. Did you remember to apt-file update first? Please post entire output of
lsb_release -d ; apt-file update ; apt-file search libssl.so.1.0.0
- thanks. -
Zac about 9 yearslibssl1.0.0:i386 was the missing package for me...