MATLAB: Determine total length/size of a structure array with fields as structure arrays

21,331

This will work if every structure array data has the same fields and are row vectors (i.e. 1-by-N):

allData = [s.data];               %# Concatenate all data arrays into one
timestamp = [allData.timestamp];  %# Collect all the time stamps

If the data structure arrays are column vectors (i.e. N-by-1), you need to use vertcat instead:

allData = vertcat(s.data);        %# Concatenate all data arrays into one
timestamp = [allData.timestamp];  %# Collect all the time stamps

The above solutions work due to the fact that accessing a single field of a structure array returns a comma-separated list.

Share:
21,331
Doresoom
Author by

Doresoom

Mechanical Engineer from St Louis, MO. Former NASA flight controller for the International Space Station.

Updated on March 30, 2020

Comments

  • Doresoom
    Doresoom about 4 years

    I have a structure array containing fields as structure arrays of varying length. For example:

    's' is a structure 'data' is a field in 's', and also a structure array itself and

    length(s(n).data) ~= length(s(m).data)
    

    I want to preallocate an array that takes a time stamp from every field s.data.timestamp. Is there a way to do this without using a for loop twice? This is what I have so far:

    % find the total length
    count=0;
    for x=1:length(s)
      count=count+length(s(x).data);
    end
    % preallocate timestamp array
    timestamp=zeros(1,count);
    % populate timestamp array
    index=1;
    for x=1:length(s)
       for y=1:length(s(x).data)
          timestamp(index)=s(x).data(y).timestamp;
          index=index+1;
       end
    end
    

    I thought about just overestimating the length that I would need based on the length of 's' and an average length of 'data', but the actual length of each 'data' field/substructure varies widely. Would I be better off just overestimating the heck out of it and trimming the resulting array afterward? Zero timestamps are impossible with the data set I'm working with, so that shouldn't be a problem.

  • Doresoom
    Doresoom over 14 years
    Wow! Only two lines - I believe the term "freakin' genius" may apply here.
  • gnovice
    gnovice over 14 years
    @doresoom: Comma-separated lists are your friends. ;)