Member variables in ES6 classes

60,984

Solution 1

ES6 will almost certainly not cover syntax for defining class variables. Only methods and getters/setters can be defined using the class syntax. This means you'll still have to go the MyClass.classVariable = 42; route for class variables.

If you just want to initialize a class with some defaults, there is a rich new syntax set for function argument and destructuring defaults you can use. To give a simple example:

class Foo {
    constructor(foo = 123) {
        this.foo = foo;
    }
}

new Foo().foo == 123
new Foo(42).foo == 42

Solution 2

I haven't used Google Closure Compiler, but with Babel you can declare static (scoped to a class) variables as described here. The article is focused on React because of the utility of static members for React, but is applicable to ES6 classes in general.

Syntax is close to your proposed syntax:

class MyClass {
    constructor(arg) { if(arg) this.arg = arg; }
    static defaultArg = 42;
    let arg = MyClass.defaultArg;
}

Note that you'll have to add 'es7.classProperties' to your .babelrc for this to compile. See the Babel 5.0.0 release notes for more info.

I don't know if there's a way to declare a static as a const.

Solution 3

While it's not part of the ES6 spec, this looks like it's coming soon and is already supported by Babel and some others.

Here's the spec: https://github.com/jeffmo/es-class-fields-and-static-properties

And a full list of all the proposals and their status: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262

Share:
60,984
MvG
Author by

MvG

Dr. Martin von Gagern. Studied computer sciences, obtained a PhD in mathematics, currently a Google site reliability engineer.

Updated on February 05, 2020

Comments

  • MvG
    MvG over 4 years

    Is there any way to use the ECMAScript6 class notation to declare either a static class variable or a default value for an instance variable? Without class what I have in mind would be written as

    function MyClass(arg) { if(arg) this.arg = arg; }
    MyClass.classVariable = 42;
    MyClass.prototype.arg = "no arg specified";
    

    The most obvious ES6-like notation in my opinion would have been

    class MyClass {
        constructor(arg) { if(arg) this.arg = arg; }
        static let classVariable = 42;
        let arg = "no arg specified";
    }
    

    But this doesn't work, since according to the current spec draft the only productions of ClassElement are static and instance methods and semicolons all by themselves. OK, one can use a pair of getter and setter methods to achieve similar semantics to what I outlined, but I guess at a severe performance penalty and with really bizarre syntax.

    Is there some draft which suggests including variables in the class notation, one way or another? If so, what was the suggested syntax, where was it published, where was it discussed, how did the discussion go, and what's the current state of affairs on that front? As it stands, this question can't be answered if no such thing has been discussed before, at any level, but I consider that unlikely.


    A bit of background: I'm currently toying with the Google closure compiler performing advanced compilation, using ES6 as input. For that to work, I need a place to put my type annotations for member variables, and I used to place them using syntax like /** @type {string} */ MyClass.prototype.arg; which is a semantic no-op in ECMAScript but provides the type information to the closure compiler nice and easy. I haven't yet found a similarly nice way to do this with a class construct. But if you care to address this aspect, that would be a comment. The question above is about member declarations which are more than no-ops, so that's what an answer here should discuss.