Merge two lists while removing duplicates

59,459

Solution 1

In just one command without any pipe :

sort -u FILE1 FILE2

search

Suppress duplicate lines

-> http://www.busybox.net/downloads/BusyBox.html

Solution 2

Another solution:

awk '!a[$0]++' file_1 file_2

Solution 3

To sort according to some key column use following :

awk '!duplicate[$1,$2,$3]++' file_1 file_2

here consider first, second and third column as your primary key.

Solution 4

The files on your question are sorted.
If the source files are indeed sorted, you can uniq and merge in one step:

sort -um file1 file2 > mylist.merge

For numeric sort (not alphanumeric), use:

sort -num file1 file2 > mylist.merge

That could not be done in-place (redirected to one source file).

If the files are not sorted, sort them (this sort could be done in place, using the sort option -o. However, the whole file needs to be loaded into memory):

sort -uo file1 file1
sort -uo file2 file2
sort -um file1 file2 > mylist.merge
mv mylist.merge originallist

That would be faster than the simpler "one command line" to sort all:

cat file1 file2 | sort -u >mylist.merge

However, this line could be useful for small files.

Share:
59,459

Related videos on Youtube

learningbee
Author by

learningbee

Updated on September 18, 2022

Comments

  • learningbee
    learningbee over 1 year

    I have an embedded linux system using Busybox (OpenWRT) - so commands are limited. I have two files that look like:

    first file

    aaaaaa
    bbbbbb
    cccccc
    mmmmmm
    nnnnnn
    

    second file

    mmmmmm
    nnnnnn
    yyyyyy
    zzzzzz
    

    I need to merge these 2 lists into 1 file, and remove the duplicates. I don't have diff (space is limited) so we get to use the great awk, sed, and grep (or other tools that might be included in a standard Busybox instance). Going to a merge file like:

    command1 > mylist.merge 
    command2 mylist.merge > originallist
    

    is totally ok. It doesn't have to be a single-line command.

    Currently defined functions in the instance of Busybox that I am using (default OpenWRT): [, [[, arping, ash, awk, basename, brctl, bunzip2, bzcat, cat, chgrp, chmod, chown, chroot, clear, cmp, cp, crond, crontab, cut, date, dd, df, dirname, dmesg, du, echo, egrep, env, expr, false, fgrep, find, free, fsync, grep, gunzip, gzip, halt, head, hexdump, hostid, hwclock, id, ifconfig, init, insmod, kill, killall, klogd, less, ln, lock, logger, logread, ls, lsmod, md5sum, mkdir, mkfifo, mknod, mktemp, mount, mv, nc, netmsg, netstat, nice, nslookup, ntpd, passwd, pgrep, pidof, ping, ping6, pivot_root, pkill, poweroff, printf, ps, pwd, reboot, reset, rm, rmdir, rmmod, route, sed, seq, sh, sleep, sort, start-stop-daemon, strings, switch_root, sync, sysctl, syslogd, tail, tar, tee, telnet, telnetd, test, time, top, touch, tr, traceroute, true, udhcpc, umount, uname, uniq, uptime, vconfig, vi, watchdog, wc, wget, which, xargs, yes, zcat

  • Admin
    Admin over 11 years
    busybox sort supports the unique flag -u.
  • Admin
    Admin over 11 years
    @Thor: oooh cheers that's not a switch I'm familiar with.
  • dza
    dza over 7 years
    I saw that it made a difference which argument came first. Otherwise great solution, thanks.
  • Pat
    Pat over 5 years
    which one is better for very large files? sort file1 file2 file3 file4 | uniq or sort -u file1 file2 file3 file4
  • damd
    damd over 3 years
    It boggles my mind that if someone posts e.g. a Python solution to a problem, people often request an explanation of the code, but whenever it's awk, which relatively few people understand, it's fine to just leave it as is. :)