Monitor limited to 1280x1024

5,452

After some more research, it appears that it is limited due to the Haswell's VGA DAC (Digital to Analog converter). It is limited to 180Mhz, whereas on my desktop, the DAC on the integrated Intel graphics is 400Mhz.

When I use the Intel drivers to specify a custom resolution of 1600x1200@60hz, it works, but 1600x1200@75hz fails with the error "The custom resolution exceeds the maximum bandwidth capacity". There is no option for CVT-RB (Reduced blanking) as the blanking interval is required for CRTs to function properly.

Share:
5,452

Related videos on Youtube

A G
Author by

A G

Updated on September 18, 2022

Comments

  • A G
    A G over 1 year

    I have a Philips 202p4 CRT monitor, maximum resolution is 2048x1536, uses a VGA cable.

    My desktop running Windows 7 supports the maximum resolution. The monitor driver is Generic PnP

    When I plug the monitor into my windows 10 notebook (with the latest Intel drivers for HD 4600 and internal display disabled), the maximum resolution is 1280x1024. I know the maximum resolution from my notebook's vga output is higher than 1280x1024 because I can output 1680x1050 on my LCD monitor via VGA.

    I haven't been able to find x64 compatible drivers for the monitor, but seeing as the Generic PnP drivers worked fine on my Win7 machine, I assume they should also work fine on Windows 10.

    How do I use the maximum resolution from my notebook?

    EDIT1: When I dump the EDID info from the monitor, it shows all of the supported resolutions:

     720 X  400   70 Hz
     640 X  480   60 Hz
     640 X  480   72 Hz
     640 X  480   75 Hz
     800 X  600   60 Hz
     800 X  600   72 Hz
     800 X  600   75 Hz
     800 X  600   85 Hz
     832 X  624   75 Hz
    1024 X  768   60 Hz
    1024 X  768   70 Hz
    1024 X  768   75 Hz
    1024 X  768   85 Hz
    1280 X 1024   75 Hz
    1280 X 1024   85 Hz
    1600 X 1200   75 Hz
    1600 X 1200   85 Hz
    1792 X 1344   75 Hz
    1920 X 1440   75 Hz
    2048 X 1536   75 Hz
    

    So the monitor itself is reporting the correct resolutions.

    • Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007
      Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007 over 8 years
      Where did you get the "latest" display adapter drivers you're using? If you didn't get them directly from the manufacturer (ie: Intel), go get and try the latest one they offer.
    • A G
      A G over 8 years
      I downloaded them directly from the Intel site.
    • Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007
      Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007 over 8 years
      What refresh rate do you have set for the monitor? According to some specs I found, you need it at 80Hz or lower to get the max. resolution for that monitor. Perhaps try dumping it down to 60Hz and see if higher resolutions become available. If so, pick it, and then bump the Hz back up as high as you can (at the resolution you want).
    • sawdust
      sawdust over 8 years
      FWIW you probably don't want to use a resolution higher than the recommended 1600x1200. Use test patterns to see how well each resolution resolves vertical & horizontal lines. Anything other than the optimum resolution will probably produce Moire and banding issues.
    • A G
      A G over 8 years
      I set the refresh rate to 60, but the list of available resolutions is the same.
    • sawdust
      sawdust over 8 years
      The issue would seem to be with Win10 video drivers. My T400 laptop (w/ Intel 4500MHD graphics) running Win7 will go up to 1600x10?? on the external CRT monitor. That exact same hardware running Win10 will only go up to 1366x768. That is under the control of the Win10 video driver. I didn't see the Intel GPU control panel in Win10, as there is in Win7.
    • A G
      A G over 8 years
      Could you try using a custom resolution? I found that it could be due to insufficient bandwidth on the DAC.
    • sawdust
      sawdust over 8 years
      "I found that it could be due to insufficient bandwidth on the DAC" -- You're missing my point. I used the same hardware, but different OSes. The available resolutions depended solely on the OS; the hardware never changed. Why would the bandwidth of a DAC depend on the OS? It doesn't. Your setup compares apples to oranges. My setup compares apples to apples.
  • A G
    A G over 8 years
    I looked at that, but the list all modes tops out at 1280x1024@85hz. I couldn't find non generic drivers, but if the Generic PnP drivers work on my win 7 desktop, I assumed the Generic PnP drivers work in windows 10 as well.
  • TOOGAM
    TOOGAM over 8 years
    If the results of the "List All Modes" button top out at 1280x1024, then that is consistent with the slider bar topping out there. That's why it is so important to uncheck that checkbox, which has the effect of modifying what shows up when the "List All Modes" button is used. You didn't really jump to the end of the paragraph and skip the middle, did you?
  • A G
    A G over 8 years
    I unechecked the "Hide modes" box, but it has no effect on the list. I think in older versions of windows, it would show everything but on my list it doens't even show 1366x768 which is the notebook's resolution.