Most efficient way to convert a single char to a CharSequence

45,606

Solution 1

textView.setText(String.valueOf(c))

Solution 2

Looking at the implementation of the Character.toString(char c) method reveals that they use almost the same code you use:

  public String toString() {
       char buf[] = {value};
       return String.valueOf(buf);
  }

For readability, you should just use Character.toString( c ).

Another efficient way would probably be

new StringBuilder(1).append(c);

It's definitely more efficient that using the + operator because, according to the javadoc:

The Java language provides special support for the string concatenation operator ( + ), and for conversion of other objects to strings. String concatenation is implemented through the StringBuilder(or StringBuffer) class and its append method

Solution 3

The most compact CharSequence you can get when you have a handful of chars is the CharBuffer. To initialize this with your char value:

CharBuffer.wrap(new char[]{c});

That being said, using Strings is a fair bit more readable and easy to work with.

Solution 4

Shorthand, as in fewest typed characters possible:

c+""; // where c is a char

In full:

textView.setText(c+"");

Solution 5

A solution without concatenation is this:

Character.valueOf(c).toString();
Share:
45,606
Graham Borland
Author by

Graham Borland

Mobile/embedded software engineer. Loads of experience with C, C++, ARM assembler, etc. Recent focus has been on Android and iOS. I love coding in Python, but I don't get to do enough of it. My favourite text editor at the moment is Sublime Text 3.

Updated on December 01, 2021

Comments

  • Graham Borland
    Graham Borland over 2 years

    What's the most efficient way to pass a single char to a method expecting a CharSequence?

    This is what I've got:

    textView.setText(new String(new char[] {c} ));
    

    According to the answers given here, this is a sensible way of doing it where the input is a character array. I was wondering if there was a sneaky shortcut I could apply in the single-char case.