Multiple Inheritance in PHP
Solution 1
Alex, most of the times you need multiple inheritance is a signal your object structure is somewhat incorrect. In situation you outlined I see you have class responsibility simply too broad. If Message is part of application business model, it should not take care about rendering output. Instead, you could split responsibility and use MessageDispatcher that sends the Message passed using text or html backend. I don't know your code, but let me simulate it this way:
$m = new Message();
$m->type = 'text/html';
$m->from = 'John Doe <[email protected]>';
$m->to = 'Random Hacker <[email protected]>';
$m->subject = 'Invitation email';
$m->importBody('invitation.html');
$d = new MessageDispatcher();
$d->dispatch($m);
This way you can add some specialisation to Message class:
$htmlIM = new InvitationHTMLMessage(); // html type, subject and body configuration in constructor
$textIM = new InvitationTextMessage(); // text type, subject and body configuration in constructor
$d = new MessageDispatcher();
$d->dispatch($htmlIM);
$d->dispatch($textIM);
Note that MessageDispatcher would make a decision whether to send as HTML or plain text depending on type
property in Message object passed.
// in MessageDispatcher class
public function dispatch(Message $m) {
if ($m->type == 'text/plain') {
$this->sendAsText($m);
} elseif ($m->type == 'text/html') {
$this->sendAsHTML($m);
} else {
throw new Exception("MIME type {$m->type} not supported");
}
}
To sum it up, responsibility is split between two classes. Message configuration is done in InvitationHTMLMessage/InvitationTextMessage class, and sending algorithm is delegated to dispatcher. This is called Strategy Pattern, you can read more on it here.
Solution 2
Maybe you can replace an 'is-a' relation with a 'has-a' relation? An Invitation might have a Message, but it does not necessarily need to 'is-a' message. An Invitation f.e. might be confirmed, which does not go well together with the Message model.
Search for 'composition vs. inheritance' if you need to know more about that.
Solution 3
If I can quote Phil in this thread...
PHP, like Java, does not support multiple inheritance.
Coming in PHP 5.4 will be traits which attempt to provide a solution to this problem.
In the meantime, you would be best to re-think your class design. You can implement multiple interfaces if you're after an extended API to your classes.
And Chris....
PHP doesn't really support multiple inheritance, but there are some (somewhat messy) ways to implement it. Check out this URL for some examples:
http://www.jasny.net/articles/how-i-php-multiple-inheritance/
Thought they both had useful links. Can't wait to try out traits or maybe some mixins...
Solution 4
The Symfony framework has a mixin plugin for this, you might want to check it out -- even just for ideas, if not to use it.
The "design pattern" answer is to abstract the shared functionality into a separate component, and compose at runtime. Think about a way to abstract out the Invitation functionality out as a class that gets associated with your Message classes in some way other than inheritance.
Solution 5
I'm using traits in PHP 5.4 as the way of solving this. http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.traits.php
This allows for classic inheritance with extends, but also gives the possible of placing common functionality and properties into a 'trait'. As the manual says:
Traits is a mechanism for code reuse in single inheritance languages such as PHP. A Trait is intended to reduce some limitations of single inheritance by enabling a developer to reuse sets of methods freely in several independent classes living in different class hierarchies.
Related videos on Youtube
Alex Weinstein
Updated on November 26, 2021Comments
-
Alex Weinstein over 2 years
I'm looking for a good, clean way to go around the fact that PHP5 still doesn't support multiple inheritance. Here's the class hierarchy:
Message
-- TextMessage
-------- InvitationTextMessage
-- EmailMessage
-------- InvitationEmailMessageThe two types of Invitation* classes have a lot in common; i'd love to have a common parent class, Invitation, that they both would inherit from. Unfortunately, they also have a lot in common with their current ancestors... TextMessage and EmailMessage. Classical desire for multiple inheritance here.
What's the most light-weight approach to solve the issue?
Thanks!
-
Ondřej Mirtes almost 12 yearsThere are not many cases in which inheritance (or even multiple inheritance) is justifiable. Look at SOLID principles. Prefer composition over inheritance.
-
Tyler over 11 years@OndřejMirtes what do you mean - "not many cases in which inheritance is justifiable."?
-
Ondřej Mirtes over 11 yearsI mean - inheritance brings more problems than benefits (look at Liskov substitution principle). You can solve almost everything with composition and save a lot of headaches. Inheritance is also static - that means you cannot change what is written already in the code. But compositition can be used at runtime and you can choose implementations dynamically - e. g. reuse the same class with different caching mechanisms.
-
f.ardelian almost 11 yearsPHP 5.4 has "traits": stackoverflow.com/a/13966131/492130
-
Sebastian Mach over 8 years@OndřejMirtes: LSP does not inherently conflict with multipe inheritance. E.g., a
Triangle
can perfectly be aFinite
(with functionboundingRectangle
) as well as aIntersectable
(with functionintersects
) without interfering with LSP at all. -
gurghet over 7 yearsI would suggest beginners to never use inheritance. In general, the only two situations in which inheritance is allowed are: 1) when building a library, so users write less code and 2) when the project lead demands you use it
-
-
Alex Weinstein over 15 yearsInterfaces do not allow for concrete function implementations, so they're not helpful here.
-
Alex Weinstein over 15 yearsAmazingly extensive answer, thank you! I learned something today!
-
Maria Eugenia D'Amato about 14 years...I know this is a bit old (I was searching to see if PHP had MI... just for curiosity) I don't think this is a good example of the Strategy Pattern. The Strategy Pattern is designed so that you can implement a new "strategy" at any time. The implementation you have provided does not feature such ability. Instead, Message should have the "send" function which calls MessageDispatcher->dispatch() (Dispatcher either a param or member var), and new classes HTMLDispatcher & TextDispatcher will implement "dispatch" in their respective ways (this allows other Dispatchers to do other work)
-
Michał Niedźwiedzki about 14 yearsUnfortunately PHP is not great for implementing Strategy pattern. Languages that support method overloading work better here - imagine you have two methods of the same name: dispatch(HTMLMessage $m) and dispatch(TextMessage $) - now in strongly typed language compiler/interpreter would automatically employ the right "strategy" based on type of parameter. Aside from that, I don't think that being open for new strategy implementation is the essence of Strategy Pattern. Sure it's a nice thing to have, but often not a requirement.
-
Craig Lewis about 14 yearsInterfaces do support Multiple Inheritance, unlike classes.
-
user102008 almost 13 yearsI think this is feasible. It will combine functionality of multiple classes, but will not actually inherit them (in the sense of
instanceof
) -
Olivier Pons almost 10 yearsYour example is very good, and it's a good workaround. But, like all Php stuff, it's always workaround. Getting close to hacking (like
traits
for example). It's never part of good programming, and adds useless complexity to implement what should be part of a good language. More on this in the second comment. -
Olivier Pons almost 10 yearsSuppose you have a class
Tracing
(this is just a sample) where you want to have generic things like debug into a file, send SMS for critical problem and so on. All your classes are children of this class. Now suppose you want to create a classException
that should have those functions (= child ofTracing
). This class must be a child ofException
. How do you design such stuff without multiple inheritance? Yes, you always may have a solution, but you will always get close to hacking. And hacking = expensive solution in the long run. End of story. -
Phil Lello about 9 yearsAnd this will surely fail to allow overrides as soon as in inner class makes a call to self::<whatever>
-
Admin about 9 yearsOlivier Pons, I don't think that subclassing Tracing would be the correct solution for your use case. Something as simple as having an abstract Tracing class with static methods Debug, SendSMS, etc., which can then be called from within any other class with Tracing::SendSMS() etc. Your other classes are not 'types of' of Tracing, they 'use' Tracing. Note: some people may prefer a singleton over static methods; I prefer to use static methods over singletons where possible.
-
Ejaz almost 6 yearsOlllllllllld answer but the dispatch class having to know the innards of message class is still a no-no. AND adding a new message type will require altering of dispatch class. Strong coupling.
-
l00k over 5 yearsBest answer IMO.
-
Jonathan over 5 yearsTraits are the way to go