Nock: No match for request

Question

My nock call looks like as below

app_url='myshop.app.com'
result = nock(app_url, {
            reqheaders: {
                 "content-type": "application/json",
                 'authorization': 'Basic Auth'
            }
          })
        .get('/admin/products.json?collection_id=10001&limit=250&fields=id')    
        .reply(200, {
                "products": [
                { "id": 101},
                {"id": 102},
            ]
        });

Resolve :

(node:1378) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection (rejection id: 1): Error: Nock: No match for request { .  

But now,

==========updated=============

I have updated my call which is not throwing an error but now it is not intercepting the request....It is still hitting shopify to fetch the data

Solution 1

Just add flag in scope { allowUnmocked: true }

nock('https://host.com', { allowUnmocked: true })
    .post(`/path`)
    .reply(200, {answer: "any"});

Solution 2

This happens when a nock matching the URL being hit is not found. The url being hit is

https://myshop.app.com/admin/products.json?collection_id=201&limit=10&fields=id

as seen in the error message. The URLs you are nocking do not correspond to it.

Something like this should work.

app_url = "https://myshop.app.com/"
result = nock(app_url, {
        reqheaders: {
            "content-type": "application/json",
        }
    })
    .get('/admin/products.json?collection_id=201&limit=10&fields=id').
    .reply(200, {
        "products": [{
            "id": 101
        }, {
            "id": 102
        }, ]
    });

More details about the exact way to nock can be found in the Nock Documentation.

Comments

[Rohit Varghese Sebastian]

@user269867 Thats bad. Just noticed the trailing ',' in the products array, not sure if that creates issues.

[Rohit Varghese Sebastian]

@user269867 Any luck with the , removal ?

[user269867]

No, I changed some config not ","

[Rohit Varghese Sebastian]

@user269867 Can you elaborate the config change that you made for it to work ?

[DoArNa]

This is not working and also no information of what you changed to make it work!!

[LEMUEL ADANE]

This is not right, it should be the other way around. You should not allow unmocked URL.