Non-transient non-serializable instance field in serializable class
My guess (but it's only a guess) is that FindBugs doesn't trigger this warning if you reference java.lang.object
instances, because it considers that in this case, your class is a generic container, which can hold any kind of object (like a Collection).
In that case, it's the responsibility of the user of the class to make sure that the object stored in the container is serializable if he wants the container to be serializable. (just like an ArrayList is serializable if and only if you store serializable objects inside the list).
Comments
-
Geek almost 2 years
Consider the following code :
public class LIMSGrid extends ClientEventSource implements Focusable, FramingBlockWrapper { //cell that is curently in edit mode private CellCoord editingCell = null; //framing block info private FramingBlock framingBlock; }
Now
ClientEventSource
extends a class that implementsSerializable
interface . The classesCellCoord
andFramingBlock
are POJOS with a bunch of getters and setters . FindBugs is complaining about theeditingCell
andframingBlock
fields saying :This Serializable class defines a non-primitive instance field which is neither transient, Serializable, or java.lang.Object, and does not appear to implement the Externalizable interface or the readObject() and writeObject() methods. Objects of this class will not be deserialized correctly if a non-Serializable object is stored in this field.
Okay so everything is fine except how come it is saying that the instance fields are not "java.lang.Object" . This is totally misleading or I am missing some basics here ?
-
Geek over 11 yearsI understand this part but my question is why is FindBUgs saying that those fileds are not objects ?