Prevent class member name obfuscation by ProGuard

110,504

Solution 1

Thanks Waqas!

I find solution for my case:

-optimizationpasses 5
-dump class_files.txt
-printseeds seeds.txt
-printusage unused.txt
-printmapping mapping.txt
-optimizations !code/simplification/arithmetic,!field/*,!class/merging*/
-allowaccessmodification
-repackageclasses ''

-keep public class * extends android.app.Activity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Application
-keep public class * extends android.app.MapActivity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Service
-keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver
-keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider

-libraryjars  libs/commons-io-2.2.jar
-libraryjars  libs/gson-2.2.2.jar
-keep public class org.apache.commons.io.**
-keep public class com.google.gson.**
-keep public class com.google.gson.** {public private protected *;}

##---------------Begin: proguard configuration for Gson ----------
-keepattributes *Annotation*,Signature
-keep class com.mypackage.ActivityMonitor.ClassMultiPoints.** { *; }
-keep public class com.mypackage.ActivityMonitor$ClassMultiPoints     { public protected *; }
-keep public class com.mypackage.ActivityMonitor$ClassMultiPoints$ClassPoints { public protected *; }
-keep public class com.mypackage.ActivityMonitor$ClassMultiPoints$ClassPoints$ClassPoint { public protected *; }
# To support Enum type of class members
-keepclassmembers enum * { *; } 
##---------------End: proguard configuration for Gson ----------

Also I don't use @SerializedName("message") in my class, aboved config work fine without serialization.

Solution 2

If you dont want your class members to be obfuscated then use SerializedName annotation provided by Gson. For example:

public class ClassMultiPoints
{
   @SerializedName("message")
   public String message;
   @SerializedName("data")
   public List<ClassPoints> data;

   ...

}

Moreover, make sure you do add proper proguard configuration for Gson library too. For example:

##---------------Begin: proguard configuration for Gson ----------
# Gson uses generic type information stored in a class file when working with
#fields. Proguard removes such information by default, so configure it to keep
#all of it.
-keepattributes Signature

# For using GSON @Expose annotation
-keepattributes *Annotation*

# Gson specific classes
-keep class sun.misc.Unsafe { *; }
#-keep class com.google.gson.stream.** { *; }

# Application classes that will be serialized/deserialized over Gson
-keep class com.google.gson.examples.android.model.** { *; }

##---------------End: proguard configuration for Gson ----------

For more info read this.

Solution 3

I also found I need to -keepclassmembers when using Dexguard's optimise option. Without this several of my model objects failed to deserialise

##---------------Begin: proguard configuration for Gson  ----------
# Gson uses generic type information stored in a class file when working with fields. Proguard
# removes such information by default, so configure it to keep all of it.
-keepattributes Signature

# For using GSON @Expose annotation
-keepattributes *Annotation*

# Application classes that will be serialized/deserialized over Gson, keepclassmembers
-keep class com.myapp.model.** { *; }
-keepclassmembers class com.myapp.model.** { *; }

Solution 4

If you use the @Expose annotation like I do, you can tell ProGuard to keep any field annotated with it:

# keep anything annotated with @Expose
-keepclassmembers public class * {
    @com.google.gson.annotations.Expose *;
}
# Also keep classes that @Expose everything
-keep @com.google.gson.annotations.Expose public class *

Solution 5

To exclude your class from obfuscation, Keep the attributes of InnerClasses, keep your class and keep the class members of the class eg.

-keepattributes InnerClasses
 -keep class com.yourproject.YourClass**
 -keepclassmembers class com.yourproject.YourClass** {
    *;
 }

For more information http://proguard.sourceforge.net/manual/examples.html

Share:
110,504

Related videos on Youtube

Tapa Save
Author by

Tapa Save

Updated on July 08, 2022

Comments

  • Tapa Save
    Tapa Save almost 2 years

    I have my class ClassMultiPoint with subclasses.

    public class ClassMultiPoints
     {
       public String message;
       public List<ClassPoints> data;
    
       public class ClassPoints
        {
          public String id;
          public List<ClassPoint> points;
          public class ClassPoint
           {
             public String speed;
             public String bearing;
           }
        }
     }
    

    I will get value of object oPoints from parse GSON:

    oPoints = gson.fromJson( jsonString, ClassMultiPoints.class);

    I try use oPoints.message.

    When I run my application without proguard app run success. When I run my app with proguard my app crash.

    I think problem is: proguard rename attribute 'oPoints.message' of my class to short 'a'.

    I try keep the names of the methods and attributes is constant, but proguard rename its:

    proguard.cfg:

    -injars      bin/classes
    -injars      libs
    -outjars     bin/classes-processed.jar
    -dontpreverify
    -repackageclasses ''
    -allowaccessmodification
    -optimizations !code/simplification/arithmetic
    -keepattributes *Annotation*
    -dontskipnonpubliclibraryclasses
    -optimizationpasses 5
    -printmapping map.txt
    -flattenpackagehierarchy
    
    -keep public class * extends android.app.Activity
    -keep public class * extends android.app.Application
    -keep public class * extends android.app.MapActivity
    -keep public class * extends android.app.Service
    -keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver
    -keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider
    
    -libraryjars  libs/commons-io-2.2.jar
    -libraryjars  libs/ftp4j-1.7.1.jar
    -libraryjars  libs/gson-2.2.2.jar
    
    -keep public class org.apache.commons.io.**
    -keep public class it.sauronsoftware.ftp4j.**
    -keep public class com.google.gson.**
    
    -keep public class com.mypackagename.ActivityMonitor$*
    
    -keep public class * extends android.view.View {
        public <init>(android.content.Context);
        public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
        public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
        public void set*(...);
    }
    
    -keepclasseswithmembers class * {
        public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
    }
    
    -keepclasseswithmembers class * {
        public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
    }
    
    -keepclassmembers class * extends android.content.Context {
       public void *(android.view.View);
       public void *(android.view.MenuItem);
    }
    
    -keepclassmembers class * implements android.os.Parcelable {
        static android.os.Parcelable$Creator CREATOR;
    }
    
    -keepclassmembers class **.R$* {
        public static <fields>;
    }
    

    What is right way to keep names of the methods and attributes of the my one (static) class?

  • umesh
    umesh about 10 years
    -keep class com.google.gson.examples.android.model.** { *; } it works for me but when i applied reverse engg on apk, i got all the model classes with not change in members, it breaks the security purpose, isn't there any other option, we can obfuscate model too ?
  • waqaslam
    waqaslam about 10 years
    are you using @SerializedName annotation on top of your class members? because if you do then you don't need to bypass custom class obfuscation in proguard config like you are doing with com.google.gson.examples.android.model.** { *; }.
  • umesh
    umesh about 10 years
    no, actually i wanted to obfuscate it. but now i realized that if the fields names change, then they won't match json key, so the gson could not parse it.
  • waqaslam
    waqaslam about 10 years
    exactly... and that's why we need to use @SerializedName
  • Oliver Dixon
    Oliver Dixon about 9 years
    Is this option available for the whole class?
  • waqaslam
    waqaslam about 9 years
    @iLoveUnicorns for that you need to tweak the proguard config to ignore obfuscating the entire class.
  • Marian Klühspies
    Marian Klühspies over 8 years
    I don´t know if it really matters, but in general using Annotations with Runtime Policy on Android can be a performance issue. I would recommend using the -keep options of Proguard instead
  • Muhammad Younas
    Muhammad Younas over 6 years
    @iDroid Explorer I use apkTool to test the release apk but obfuscation did not work for me it did not rename the classes
  • Tapa Save
    Tapa Save over 6 years
    This settings allow NOT obfuscate the code. Are you need obfuscate code?
  • Muhammad Younas
    Muhammad Younas over 6 years
    yes this code is not obfuscate or I am testing wrong release apk
  • Mirjalal
    Mirjalal over 5 years
    special thanks for -keepclassmembers class com.myapp.model.** { *; }. despite of I am using jackson lib rather than gson, that line helped me! Thanks.
  • Anton Kazakov
    Anton Kazakov almost 5 years
    According to GSON javadoc @Expose can target fields only. So second instruction seems useless