Python functools.wraps equivalent for classes
Solution 1
Everyone seems to have missed the obvious solution. Using functools.update_wrapper
:
>>> import functools
>>> class memoized(object):
"""Decorator that caches a function's return value each time it is called.
If called later with the same arguments, the cached value is returned, and
not re-evaluated.
"""
def __init__(self, func):
self.func = func
self.cache = {}
functools.update_wrapper(self, func) ## TA-DA! ##
def __call__(self, *args):
pass # Not needed for this demo.
>>> @memoized
def fibonacci(n):
"""fibonacci docstring"""
pass # Not needed for this demo.
>>> fibonacci
<__main__.memoized object at 0x0156DE30>
>>> fibonacci.__name__
'fibonacci'
>>> fibonacci.__doc__
'fibonacci docstring'
Solution 2
I'm not aware of such things in stdlib, but we can create our own if we need to.
Something like this can work :
from functools import WRAPPER_ASSIGNMENTS
def class_wraps(cls):
"""Update a wrapper class `cls` to look like the wrapped."""
class Wrapper(cls):
"""New wrapper that will extend the wrapper `cls` to make it look like `wrapped`.
wrapped: Original function or class that is beign decorated.
assigned: A list of attribute to assign to the the wrapper, by default they are:
['__doc__', '__name__', '__module__', '__annotations__'].
"""
def __init__(self, wrapped, assigned=WRAPPER_ASSIGNMENTS):
self.__wrapped = wrapped
for attr in assigned:
setattr(self, attr, getattr(wrapped, attr))
super().__init__(wrapped)
def __repr__(self):
return repr(self.__wrapped)
return Wrapper
Usage:
@class_wraps
class memoized:
"""Decorator that caches a function's return value each time it is called.
If called later with the same arguments, the cached value is returned, and
not re-evaluated.
"""
def __init__(self, func):
super().__init__()
self.func = func
self.cache = {}
def __call__(self, *args):
try:
return self.cache[args]
except KeyError:
value = self.func(*args)
self.cache[args] = value
return value
except TypeError:
# uncacheable -- for instance, passing a list as an argument.
# Better to not cache than to blow up entirely.
return self.func(*args)
def __get__(self, obj, objtype):
return functools.partial(self.__call__, obj)
@memoized
def fibonacci(n):
"""fibonacci docstring"""
if n in (0, 1):
return n
return fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2)
print(fibonacci)
print("__doc__: ", fibonacci.__doc__)
print("__name__: ", fibonacci.__name__)
Output:
<function fibonacci at 0x14627c0>
__doc__: fibonacci docstring
__name__: fibonacci
EDIT:
And if you are wondering why this wasn't included in the stdlib is because you can
wrap your class decorator in a function decorator and use functools.wraps
like this:
def wrapper(f):
memoize = memoized(f)
@functools.wraps(f)
def helper(*args, **kws):
return memoize(*args, **kws)
return helper
@wrapper
def fibonacci(n):
"""fibonacci docstring"""
if n <= 1:
return n
return fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2)
Solution 3
Turns out there's a straightforward solution using functools.wraps
itself:
import functools
def dec(cls):
@functools.wraps(cls, updated=())
class D(cls):
decorated = 1
return D
@dec
class C:
"""doc"""
print(f'{C.__name__=} {C.__doc__=} {C.__wrapped__=}')
$ python3 t.py
C.__name__='C' C.__doc__='doc' C.__wrapped__=<class '__main__.C'>
Note that updated=()
is needed to prevent an attempt to update the class's __dict__
(this output is without updated=()
):
$ python t.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "t.py", line 26, in <module>
class C:
File "t.py", line 20, in dec
class D(cls):
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/functools.py", line 57, in update_wrapper
getattr(wrapper, attr).update(getattr(wrapped, attr, {}))
AttributeError: 'mappingproxy' object has no attribute 'update'
Solution 4
I needed something that would wrap both classes and functions and wrote this:
def wrap_is_timeout(base):
'''Adds `.is_timeout=True` attribute to objects returned by `base()`.
When `base` is class, it returns a subclass with same name and adds read-only property.
Otherwise, it returns a function that sets `.is_timeout` attribute on result of `base()` call.
Wrappers make best effort to be transparent.
'''
if inspect.isclass(base):
class wrapped(base):
is_timeout = property(lambda _: True)
for k in functools.WRAPPER_ASSIGNMENTS:
v = getattr(base, k, _MISSING)
if v is not _MISSING:
try:
setattr(wrapped, k, v)
except AttributeError:
pass
return wrapped
@functools.wraps(base)
def fun(*args, **kwargs):
ex = base(*args, **kwargs)
ex.is_timeout = True
return ex
return fun
Solution 5
All we really need to do is modify the behavior of the decorator so that it is "hygienic", i.e. it is attribute-preserving.
#!/usr/bin/python3
def hygienic(decorator):
def new_decorator(original):
wrapped = decorator(original)
wrapped.__name__ = original.__name__
wrapped.__doc__ = original.__doc__
wrapped.__module__ = original.__module__
return wrapped
return new_decorator
This is ALL you need. In general. It doesn't preserve the signature, but if you really want that you can use a library to do that. I also went ahead and rewrote the memoization code so that it works on keyword arguments as well. Also there was a bug where failure to convert it to a hashable tuple would make it not work in 100% of cases.
Demo of rewritten memoized
decorator with @hygienic
modifying its behavior. memoized
is now a function that wraps the original class, though you can (like the other answer) write a wrapping class instead, or even better, something which detects if it's a class and if so wraps the __init__
method.
@hygienic
class memoized:
def __init__(self, func):
self.func = func
self.cache = {}
def __call__(self, *args, **kw):
try:
key = (tuple(args), frozenset(kw.items()))
if not key in self.cache:
self.cache[key] = self.func(*args,**kw)
return self.cache[key]
except TypeError:
# uncacheable -- for instance, passing a list as an argument.
# Better to not cache than to blow up entirely.
return self.func(*args,**kw)
In action:
@memoized
def f(a, b=5, *args, keyword=10):
"""Intact docstring!"""
print('f was called!')
return {'a':a, 'b':b, 'args':args, 'keyword':10}
x=f(0)
#OUTPUT: f was called!
print(x)
#OUTPUT: {'a': 0, 'b': 5, 'keyword': 10, 'args': ()}
y=f(0)
#NO OUTPUT - MEANS MEMOIZATION IS WORKING
print(y)
#OUTPUT: {'a': 0, 'b': 5, 'keyword': 10, 'args': ()}
print(f.__name__)
#OUTPUT: 'f'
print(f.__doc__)
#OUTPUT: 'Intact docstring!'
Related videos on Youtube
![Neil G](https://i.stack.imgur.com/oLbIt.jpg?s=256&g=1)
Comments
-
Neil G about 2 years
When defining a decorator using a class, how do I automatically transfer over
__name__
,__module__
and__doc__
? Normally, I would use the @wraps decorator from functools. Here's what I did instead for a class (this is not entirely my code):class memoized: """Decorator that caches a function's return value each time it is called. If called later with the same arguments, the cached value is returned, and not re-evaluated. """ def __init__(self, func): super().__init__() self.func = func self.cache = {} def __call__(self, *args): try: return self.cache[args] except KeyError: value = self.func(*args) self.cache[args] = value return value except TypeError: # uncacheable -- for instance, passing a list as an argument. # Better to not cache than to blow up entirely. return self.func(*args) def __repr__(self): return self.func.__repr__() def __get__(self, obj, objtype): return functools.partial(self.__call__, obj) __doc__ = property(lambda self:self.func.__doc__) __module__ = property(lambda self:self.func.__module__) __name__ = property(lambda self:self.func.__name__)
Is there a standard decorator to automate the creation of name module and doc? Also, to automate the get method (I assume that's for creating bound methods?) Are there any missing methods?
-
Neil G about 13 yearsThanks mouad. Do you know what the purpose of the
__get__
method is? -
Neil G about 13 yearsOh, I see: it makes the decorator work with methods? It probably should be in class_wraps then?
-
mouad about 13 years@Neil: Yes For more detail: stackoverflow.com/questions/5469956/… , IMO i don't think so because it will violate one of the principles that i believe in for function or class which is unique responsibility , which in the case of
class_wraps
will be to Update a wrapper class to look like the wrapped. no less not more :) -
Neil G about 13 years@mouad: Thanks a lot. I have a couple more questions (for you or anyone else) if you don't mind: 1. Isn't it true that we will want to override
__get__
for all "callable class" decorators? 2. Why do we usefunctools.partial
instead of returning a bound method withtypes.MethodType(self.__call__, obj)
? -
mouad about 13 years@Neil: 1. Yes if you want to be able to decorate also methods (not just functions) as you already said , and i strongly believe that it's a good practice to implement also the
_get__
method for class decorator so to not have any weird problems after :) 2. I think it just a a question of preferencethe beauty is in the eye of the beholder
right , i prefer to usefunctools.partial
in cases like this one and mostly i usetypes.*
to test the types of an object, Hope i answer your questions :) -
ninjagecko about 13 yearsThe reason you shouldn't use this is because, as you show, you have to call the
__init__
method of the parent classes (not necessarily justsuper()
; you should google formethod resolution order python
). -
Neil G about 13 years@ninjagecko: Isn't it up to the super class to call the
__init__
method of the other parent classes? -
ninjagecko about 13 years@mouad: oops, I misunderstood your code. I apologize for the downvote. I will upvote you somewhere else you deserve...
-
ninjagecko about 13 yearsIt somewhat of an open question, as far as I know, I may be wrong though. fuhm.net/super-harmful Also stackoverflow.com/questions/1385759/… does not seem to indicate any consensus.
-
Neil G about 13 years@ninjagecko: Yes, I've read the first article. What I've been doing is to always call super().__init__ from every class no matter what. This way I can count on all
__init__
methods being called as long as everyone I inherit from does this. Unfortunately, I've discovered that PyQt classes don't do this. I really thought that this was how co-operative inheritance had to work, but from what you're saying it sounds like I might be the only one! -
mouad about 13 years@ninjagecko: hehehe, no worries :)
-
cfi over 12 yearsThe @hygienic does not work for code where the wrapped decorator class has a class attribute. Mouad's solution works though. The problem reported is:
AttributeError: 'function' object has no attribute 'level'
when trying to dodecoratorclassname.level += 1
inside the__call__
-
Asclepius almost 11 yearsIn Python 2.7, the line
super().__init__(wrapped)
raises the exceptionTypeError: super() takes at least 1 argument (0 given)
. -
Wesley Baugh over 9 yearsThe
__name__
and__doc__
are set on the instance, but not the class, which is what is always used byhelp(instance)
. To fix, a class-based decorator implementation cannot be used, and instead the decorator must be implemented as a function. For details see stackoverflow.com/a/25973438/1988505. -
temoto over 7 yearsSide note, I invite everybody to use this
.is_timeout=True
idiom to mark your timeout caused errors and accept this API from other packages. -
samwyse over 7 yearsI'm not sure why my answer was suddenly marked down yesterday. No one asked about getting help() to work. In 3.5, inspect.signature() and inspect.from_callable() got a new follow_wrapped option; perhaps help() should do the same?
-
vdboor over 5 yearsFortunately ipython's
fibonacci?
does show both the doc from the wrapper, and the memoized class so you get both -
mathtick about 4 yearsThis does not produce picklable class decorators
-
Neil G over 3 yearsI don't understand what this has to do with my question. How do I implement
memoized
as a class and provide the wrapping functionality? -
David Marx over 3 years@NeilG if it makes you feel better, this at least answered my question, which mapped to the title of the OP question but not the specific memoize example.
-
meyer1994 over 2 yearsThis solved my problem of searching an equivalent of
functools.wraps
for clases -
samwyse about 2 yearsUpdate: Starting from Python 3.9, help() now shows the wrapped function's docstring, though it still lacks the argument list