Python: get a dict from a list based on something inside the dict

72,560

Solution 1

my_item = next((item for item in my_list if item['id'] == my_unique_id), None)

This iterates through the list until it finds the first item matching my_unique_id, then stops. It doesn't store any intermediate lists in memory (by using a generator expression) or require an explicit loop. It sets my_item to None of no object is found. It's approximately the same as

for item in my_list:
    if item['id'] == my_unique_id:
        my_item = item
        break
else:
    my_item = None

else clauses on for loops are used when the loop is not ended by a break statement.

Solution 2

If you have to do this multiple times, you should recreate a dictionnary indexed by id with your list :

keys = [item['id'] for item in initial_list]
new_dict = dict(zip(keys, initial_list)) 

>>>{
    'yet another id': {'id': 'yet another id', 'value': 901.20000000000005, 'title': 'last title'}, 
    'an id': {'id': 'an id', 'value': 123.40000000000001, 'title': 'some value'}, 
    'another id': {'id': 'another id', 'value': 567.79999999999995, 'title': 'another title'}
}

or in a one-liner way as suggested by agf :

new_dict = dict((item['id'], item) for item in initial_list)

Solution 3

I used this, since my colleagues are probably more able to understand what's going on when I do this compared to some other solutions provided here:

[item for item in item_list if item['id'] == my_unique_id][0]

And since it's used in a test, I think the extra memory usage isn't too big of a deal (but please correct me if I am wrong). There's only 8 items in the list in my case.

Solution 4

Worked only with iter() for me:

my_item = next(iter(item for item in my_list if item['id'] == my_unique_id), None)

Solution 5

You can create a simple function for this purpose:

lVals = [{'title': 'some value', 'value': 123.4,'id': 'an id'},
 {'title': 'another title', 'value': 567.8,'id': 'another id'},
 {'title': 'last title', 'value': 901.2, 'id': 'yet another id'}]

def get_by_id(vals, expId): return next(x for x in vals if x['id'] == expId)

get_by_id(lVals, 'an id')
>>> {'value': 123.4, 'title': 'some value', 'id': 'an id'}
Share:
72,560

Related videos on Youtube

johneth
Author by

johneth

Updated on January 09, 2020

Comments

  • johneth
    johneth over 4 years

    I need to be able to find an item in a list (an item in this case being a dict) based on some value inside that dict. The structure of the list I need to process looks like this:

    [
        {
            'title': 'some value',
            'value': 123.4,
            'id': 'an id'
        },
        {
            'title': 'another title',
            'value': 567.8,
            'id': 'another id'
        },
        {
            'title': 'last title',
            'value': 901.2,
            'id': 'yet another id'
        }
    ]
    

    Caveats: title and value can be any value (and the same), id would be unique.

    I need to be able to get a dict from this list based on a unique id. I know this can be done through the use of loops, but this seems cumbersome, and I have a feeling that there's an obvious method of doing this that I'm not seeing thanks to brain melt.

  • agf
    agf almost 13 years
    This keeps going through the list after it has found a match.
  • TyrantWave
    TyrantWave almost 13 years
    If the ID should be unique, then doing a len() on this will show that you're getting non-unique IDs
  • agf
    agf almost 13 years
    It's not a matter of the ids maybe being non-unique -- it's the difference between doing an average of len(my_list) comparisons or len(my_list) // 2 comparisons. Your version does twice as much work (on average) as is necessary.
  • agf
    agf almost 13 years
    new_dict = dict((item['id'], item) for item in initial_list)... why create an intermediate list then zip?
  • TyrantWave
    TyrantWave almost 13 years
    Fair enough - although knowing when you have two matching IDs can be useful sometimes, I suppose set size also comes into play.
  • agf
    agf almost 13 years
    True -- but he told us the ids were unique as part of the question.
  • Augiwan
    Augiwan almost 11 years
    @agf What do you recommend when there are multiple matches and you want to extract them in a list(of matched dicts)?
  • agf
    agf almost 11 years
    @UGS If you need to scan the whole list and build up a result list, and not just find the first match, you can't do better than a list comprehension like [item for item in my_list if item['id'] == my_unique_id].